PEC Meeting 9/8/2025

Updated 4 days ago

The Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) generally meets on each month's second and fourth Mondays at 1 p.m.

This volunteer board of the Town of Vail is responsible for reviewing planning and environmental issues within the town. The Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) generally meets on each month's second and fourth Mondays at 1 p.m.

Chapters

Welcome and Roll Call (00:00:00)
The meeting was called to order with a welcome message. All members were present except Commissioner Litner.

The meeting of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission was called to order. A welcome message was delivered, and it was noted that all members were present except for Commissioner Litner.
Introduction from Housing Director (00:00:16)
Jason Dietz, Housing Director, provided an update on the Timber Ridge EQ credit program, including changes in pricing, down payment assistance, and credit application.

Jason Dietz, the Housing Director, provided an update from the Town Council meeting regarding the Timber Ridge Employee Housing Unit de-restricted credit program. Key changes include maintaining pricing with an addition of a down payment assistance program, credits not needing to be in whole unit increments, credit security prior to building permits, and eligibility changes for past contracts. The update aims to assist local workers in accessing housing.
Discussion on Major Exterior Alteration (00:15:11)
Heather Knight presented a proposal for major exterior alteration and redevelopment of the Concert Hall Plaza, including new pedestrian easements and architectural features.

Heather Knight presented a proposal for the redevelopment of the Concert Hall Plaza, focusing on major exterior alterations. The discussion included the introduction of new pedestrian easements through the building, preservation of bus stops and loading areas, and architectural features to enhance public space connectivity. The proposal aims to create a significant architectural portal as a gateway to the community. Various aspects, such as building articulation, zoning compliance, and setback requirements, were discussed, with feedback requested from the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Discussion on Pedestrian Path Relocation (00:36:33)
Discussion on relocating the pedestrian path through the building and its implications on design and easement.

The meeting discussed the relocation of the pedestrian path through the building. The path was originally eight feet wide at certain points, which was considered a pinch point. The path's redesign was reviewed from both public works and planning staff perspectives. The Town Council's approval is required as they are the holders of the easement.
Presentation by Applicant Team (00:39:00)
Applicant team presents the proposed changes and seeks input on pedestrian path relocation and architectural modifications.

The applicant team, consisting of Alison Kent from Morelo Planning Group and Kit Austin Pierce from Austin Architects, presented the proposed relocation of the pedestrian path and associated site and architectural changes. They emphasized the importance of the path's location for the project's progression and sought input on proposed changes from the previous review.
Public Outreach Efforts (00:39:57)
Efforts to counter misinformation and increase community engagement regarding the project.

The applicant has increased community outreach efforts to counter misinformation about the project. They are working with existing commercial property owners and have sent out a questionnaire to current tenants. It was clarified that the bus stop would remain during construction, although it might need temporary relocation.
Architectural and Site Plan Changes (00:40:48)
Overview of changes to the building's architecture and site plan due to the path's relocation.

The relocation of the pedestrian path to the building's main level has resulted in site and architectural changes, including a larger commercial unit on the building's southwest corner. The path's new alignment allows for improved landscaping and patios, providing more privacy and separation from surrounding areas.
Parking and Circulation Plan (00:43:34)
Discussion on parking challenges and proposed circulation improvements for the site.

The team discussed the challenges of parking the building and maintaining commercial square footage. They proposed following the existing traffic flow into the garage and widening the entrance to allow for better vehicle staging. This plan also improves trash truck staging to avoid congestion.
Design Guidelines Compliance (00:54:00)
Efforts to comply with design guidelines through architectural modifications and mass reduction.

The proposed design changes aim to comply with Lion's Head Design Guidelines by reducing the building's mass and creating more step-backs. The roof and tower elements have been scaled down to make the building less imposing, and the team has worked to improve the building's visual integration with its surroundings.
Public Comments and Questions (01:03:42)
Questions from commissioners about outdoor areas and potential variances needed for the project.

Commissioners inquired about the design of outdoor dining areas on the building's south side and whether variances would be needed to expand seating into setback areas. The applicant clarified that any expansion beyond zoning allowances would require a variance.
Pedestrian Mall and Concert Hall Connection (01:05:39)
Discussion about the potential connection between the pedestrian mall and concert hall, considering grading and future developments.

The council discussed the possibility of connecting the pedestrian mall to the concert hall. It was noted that due to grading issues, a direct connection is unlikely unless future developments occur. The intent of the master plan was considered, and it was concluded that the current site should be assessed independently, with no immediate plans to link the pedestrian mall to the concert hall.
Pedestrian Path Alignment and Traffic Concerns (01:07:32)
Evaluation of pedestrian path alignment, bus interface, and traffic pattern concerns related to the garage and bus stop.

The alignment of the pedestrian path, pedestrian flow, and bus and trash interfaces were discussed. Concerns about the traffic pattern coming off the circle, and how it interacts with the garage and bus stop were raised. It was noted that following the same traffic pattern as buses might be the best option due to site constraints.
Garage Operations and Traffic Flow (01:09:22)
Discussion on the expected traffic flow within the garage and the potential use of the bus lane by vehicles accessing the garage.

Concerns were raised about vehicles accessing the garage potentially using the bus lane, especially during winter when vehicles may have difficulty pulling through. It was noted that cars currently drive through the bus lane, and this is more of an enforcement issue. The garage is primarily for owners and commercial space use, not general public parking.
Parking Structure Alarms and Operations (01:10:33)
Discussion on the requirements for audible and visible alarms for the automated parking structure, focusing on local regulations and acoustic options.

The council discussed the necessity of audible and visible alarms for the automated parking structure. It was noted that while New York requires them, it's unclear if Colorado does. Options to make the alarms acoustically pleasing, like using chimes or a voice, were considered.
Building Alignment and Landscaping Challenges (01:12:27)
Consideration of building alignment, lighting, and landscaping, with emphasis on enhancing visual aesthetics and safety.

The discussion focused on the alignment of the building, lighting systems, and landscaping challenges. The need for aesthetically pleasing lighting that adheres to dark sky principles was highlighted. The importance of robust landscaping that complements the building's design and enhances the open areas was emphasized.
Commercial Space and Ventilation Systems (01:23:29)
Clarification on the availability of commercial space and the routing of ventilation systems for potential restaurant use.

The council discussed the commercial spaces available, particularly focusing on the need for ventilation systems if they were to be used for restaurants. It was confirmed that routing for hood systems would be internal and vertical, with rooftop equipment considered for future restaurant operations.
Public Comment Session (01:28:53)
Public comments were invited concerning the pedestrian walkway width and its impact on future pedestrian traffic due to potential redevelopment in the area.

The public was invited to comment on the proposed developments. Concerns were raised about the reduced width of the pedestrian walkway and its ability to handle increased pedestrian traffic from potential area redevelopment. It was emphasized that the walkway could become a choke point if not addressed.
Public Comments on Lionshead Development (01:36:06)
Public comments were made regarding the proposed development at Lionshead, focusing on the pedestrian access, easement, and commercial space.

Multiple residents and stakeholders provided their comments on the proposed Lionshead development. Concerns were raised about the design of the pedestrian walkway, the easement width, the potential impact on commercial spaces, and the overall aesthetics of the building. Suggestions were made to improve the entrance experience to Lionshead from the west and to ensure the development aligns with the master plan.
Commissioner Comments on Lionshead Development (02:07:09)
Commissioners discussed the Lionshead project, focusing on pedestrian access, compliance with guidelines, and commercial space.

The commissioners provided their feedback on the Lionshead development proposal. They emphasized the need for the project to comply with the existing guidelines and master plans, discussed the importance of maintaining commercial spaces, and suggested improvements to the pedestrian access through the building. They acknowledged the public's concerns and expressed the need for a balanced approach between development and community impact.
Motion to Continue Lionshead Discussion (02:09:00)
A motion was made and passed to continue the Lionshead development discussion to the next meeting.

Commissioner Haage made a motion to continue the discussion on the Lionshead development to the next meeting in September. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lipnick and passed unanimously by the commissioners.
Next Agenda Items and Opening of New Items (02:09:15)
The next items on the agenda were introduced, concerning major exterior alterations and redevelopment projects.

The chair introduced the next agenda items, which pertain to applications for major exterior alterations and redevelopment of multiple family residential units. Staff suggested opening the first two items together due to a shared staff report.
Discussion on Lionshead Circle Re-subdivision (02:10:13)
Discussion on the Lionshead Circle Re-subdivision, including PEC application review by Greg Roy and Telemark Ventures LLC.

The planner Greg Roy and the applicant Telemark Ventures LLC, represented by Ruther Associates, present a request for a conditional use permit. This is for the re-subdivision of Lionshead Circle involving parts of lots, including the operation of a public or private parking lot. The application is for a conditional use permit in compliance with Vail Town Code.
Presentation by Planner Greg Roy (02:11:52)
Greg Roy presents the re-subdivision plan, including vicinity maps, site plans, and the current state of the property.

Greg Roy provides a presentation on the Lionshead Circle re-subdivision. He discusses the vicinity maps, outlining the subject property, which includes lots one and two A, across from the Lionshead parking garage. He describes the current state of the property, which is the site of a parking lot and the Lions Pride building. The re-subdivision involves plans for a multi-family residential building with seven stories and below-grade parking.
Overview of Applications and Housing Plan (02:14:04)
Overview of three applications for the property: major exterior alteration, conditional use permit, and minor subdivision.

The applications associated with the Lionshead Circle re-subdivision include: 1) a major exterior alteration for a multi-family residential building with seven stories above grade and below-grade parking; 2) a conditional use permit for excess parking space within the building; 3) a minor subdivision to combine lots one A and two A and amend plat notes. The housing plan utilizes the Timber Ridge credit program for employee housing, with changes from the last meeting regarding the reopening of the program.
Design and Parking Details (02:15:03)
Details on design aspects, parking structure, and compliance with development standards.

The presentation covers design details of the proposed buildings, including elevations and the articulation of facades. The parking structure will provide more spaces than required, necessitating a public parking conditional use permit. The application meets all development standards, with no variances proposed, and includes heated pedestrian walkways and pedestrian connections to Sunbird Park.
Public Comments and Staff Recommendations (02:17:30)
Public comments on parking and staff recommendations for approval with conditions.

The meeting includes a segment for public comments, particularly regarding parking concerns. Staff recommends approval of the applications with conditions, noting that the project exceeds parking requirements and is designed to mitigate development impacts. Further details include the heating of sidewalks and relocation of the grand staircase in compliance with the Lionshead redevelopment master plan.
Commissioners' Questions on Design Deviations (02:19:30)
Commissioners inquire about design deviations and compliance with the Lionshead redevelopment master plan.

Commissioners ask staff and the applicant about design deviations, particularly concerning building eaves and step backs. Staff explains that while some deviations exist, the design generally meets the intent of the master plan, providing pedestrian-level scale and articulation. The applicant elaborates on architectural features and materials used to comply with guidelines.
Applicant Presentation and Architectural Discussion (02:25:00)
Applicant team presents architectural details and responds to commissioners' questions about design and materials.

The applicant, represented by George Ruther and Charlie Starr, discusses architectural elements and deviations. They highlight the articulation on the building's facades, use of materials, and architectural features designed to comply with the master plan. They address commissioners' concerns about the appearance of stair and elevator towers and suggest possible enhancements.
Further Discussion on Architectural Features (02:30:00)
Further discussion on architectural features and possible improvements to stair and elevator tower designs.

Commissioners continue to discuss the building's architectural features, focusing on stair and elevator towers. They express concerns about the lack of interest in these areas and suggest ways to enhance their appearance through material changes and architectural detailing. The applicant considers these suggestions and discusses potential enhancements to meet the project's design goals.
Questions for the Applicant (02:39:59)
Commissioners ask questions to the applicant about the housing plan and architectural deviations.

The meeting begins with commissioners asking the applicant questions about the housing plan and architectural deviations. The applicant provides details on the compliance with Vail Town code and comprehensive plan.
Presentation of the Housing Plan (02:40:00)
The applicant presents the updated housing plan for the Lions Head Circle residences in detail.

The applicant presents an updated and amended housing plan for the Lions Head Circle residences, discussing compliance with the Vail Town code, calculation methods, schedule, offsite unit requests, and fee in lieu requests. The plan aims to meet the town's housing goals through partnerships and private sector involvement.
Discussion on Timber Ridge Deed Restriction (02:55:55)
The commission discusses the Timber Ridge Deed Restriction credit program and its application.

Discussion ensues regarding the application of the Timber Ridge Deed Restriction credit program as a means of achieving compliance with inclusionary zoning requirements. Commissioners seek clarification on conditions and the applicant confirms understanding of the requirements.
Public Comment (03:05:08)
Members of the public provide comments regarding the proposed development.

Public comments are heard, including concerns about the size and impact of the proposed building, parking logistics, trash logistics, and the effect on surrounding properties. Some concerns relate to the aesthetic and practical impacts on neighboring buildings and access during and after construction.
Commissioner Comments (03:14:00)
Commissioners provide final comments on the proposed project and its compliance with housing mitigation requirements.

Commissioners provide their final comments on the project, discussing the housing mitigation requirements and the use of the Timber Ridge credit program. Some commissioners express concerns about the program and its implications, while recognizing the need to comply with council directives.
Discussion on Construction and Site Plans (03:14:07)
Discussion on site circulation, fire department access, parking garage access, and coordination with adjacent property owners during construction.

The meeting discussed construction and site circulation plans, including fire department access, parking garage access, temporary parking, and trash removal. Coordination with adjacent property owners during construction was emphasized.
Concerns About Housing Program and Building Design (03:18:00)
Commissioners discuss concerns with a housing program and building design deviations, focusing on stair towers and architectural interest.

Commissioners expressed concerns about a housing program and its application to projects, and discussed building design, particularly stair towers and elevator towers. The lack of architectural interest and compliance with criteria was noted.
Motion and Vote on Major Exterior Alteration Request (03:21:11)
Commissioners vote on a request for a major exterior alteration, approving with conditions.

Commissioner Smith moved to approve with conditions the request for a major exterior alteration. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ardor and was carried with a majority vote.
Approval of Conditional Use Permit Amendment (03:23:20)
A vote was held to approve a conditional use permit amendment, focusing on public operation on East Lionhead Circle.

The Planning and Environmental Commission approved with conditions a request for an amendment to a conditional use permit, allowing for public operation on East Lionhead Circle.
Approval of Minor Subdivision Request (03:24:38)
The commission discusses and approves a minor subdivision request to vacate a common lot line and amend plat notes.

A minor subdivision request was discussed to vacate the common lot line between lot 1A and lot 2A, and to amend existing plat notes. The commission approved the request with conditions.
Public Comment on Subdivision and Development (03:29:13)
There was a call for public comment on the subdivision and development proposals, but no comments were received.

The chair called for public comment on the subdivision and development proposals. No comments were received from the public, either in-person or online.
Commissioner Comments and Motion on Subdivision (03:30:06)
Commissioners shared comments on the subdivision proposal and voted to approve it with conditions.

Commissioners shared their comments on the subdivision proposal, stating that it met the criteria. A motion was made by Commissioner Hagadorn and seconded by Commissioner Lipnick to approve the proposal with conditions.
Project Overview and Height Measurement (03:47:29)
Discussion on measuring building heights, existing and proposed grades, and overview of the Lunar Vale South project.

The meeting began with a detailed presentation on the Lunar Vale South project, focusing on how building heights are measured. The criteria for height measurement include existing grade within the building footprint or proposed grade outside the footprint, whichever is more restrictive. The staff provided a full analysis in the plan set, agreeing with the height findings as listed. The presentation included details on how the building would be laid out, the connection between Apollo Park South and Lunar Park South through the parking garage, and site coverage definitions.
Building and Site Layout Analysis (03:48:03)
Explanation of building layout, parking access, and site coverage above grade for the Lunar Vale and Apollo Park buildings.

The discussion continued with an analysis of the building and site layout. The Lunar Vale residences are to the north, with parking access from the frontage road. The building extends across the site below grade, allowing access between Lunar Park South and Apollo Park buildings through the parking garage. The site coverage was discussed, noting that only above-grade site coverage is now considered. Elevation plans were shown to illustrate the heights and steps in the building design, as well as the relationship to adjacent properties and the existing grade.
Development Standards and Comparisons (03:52:01)
Comparison of development standards, density, GRFA, and special development district criteria with surrounding buildings.

The presentation moved to a comparison of development standards and how the proposed development aligns with or deviates from these standards. The focus was on setbacks, height, and density relative to the surrounding developments like Mountain View and Altus. It was noted that employee housing units in Altus are not counted towards density. The discussion highlighted that the proposed development seeks to vary from the underlying zone district standards to achieve greater compliance with the town's comprehensive plan and master plan recommendations.
Master Plan and Special Development District (03:54:55)
Discussion on compliance with the Vail Village Master plan and the use of special development district for the project.

The meeting covered how the proposed development aligns with the Vail Village Master Plan's action plan for the East Frontage Road sub-area. The project seeks to amend a portion of the development site to allow for five to six stories, aligning with surrounding developments. The use of special development districts is emphasized as a means to achieve town goals for redevelopment, with deviations from density, GRFA, setbacks, and height as necessary to comply with adopted goals and objectives.
Applicant Presentation and Comments (04:05:23)
The applicant's representative, George Ruther, presents the project, addressing building height, site layout, and master plan compliance.

George Ruther, representing Lunar Vale Land Investments, presented the project on behalf of the ownership group. He provided an overview of the partnership with Apollo Park HOA, the project's objectives, and how it meets the town's goals for redevelopment. Ruther discussed the building program, site plans, and land use, highlighting the compliance with the Vail Village Master Plan and the need for a special development district. He addressed questions about building height and the conditional use permit for timeshare units, emphasizing the project's alignment with master plan recommendations.
Discussion on Master Plan Redevelopment Opportunities (04:18:21)
The master plan outlines opportunities for residential redevelopment on the site, replacing surface parking with new residential infill.

The meeting opened with a discussion of the opportunities for redevelopment as outlined in the master plan. The plan suggests replacing the existing surface parking lot with new residential development, increasing the residential density on the site. Prior developments like Mountain View and Altus were noted, and the remaining surface parking is north of the Apollo Park building. The master plan recommends a step back of the building mass to prevent sunshade impact on the road and to provide a landscape buffer. The proposal includes compliance with these recommendations.
Presentation of Development Constraints and Site Plan (04:20:27)
A new survey highlights development constraints, property lines, utility easements, and building setbacks.

The presentation highlighted the constraints on the development site, including property line configurations, utility easements running through the southern third of the property, and existing building encroachments due to past variances. The site plan shows the building frontage and setbacks, emphasizing unique property line shapes and the impact of steep slopes on development. The historical context of over-lot grading impacting topography was discussed, along with the need for stream track enhancements as part of public benefits.
Discussion on Building Orientation and Site Configuration (04:24:34)
Proposed building orientation aligns with existing east-west orientation of nearby developments and site constraints.

The discussion focused on the orientation of the proposed development, aligning it with the east-west orientation of neighboring structures like Altus VA and Vail Mountain View residences. The unique site width necessitates a north-south orientation for the parking structure, differing from the typical east-west alignment. The architectural site plan was reviewed, showing compliance with town planning recommendations and addressing questions about building orientation and site alignment.
Review of Historical Development Approvals and Master Plan Recommendations (04:25:36)
Historical approvals for Vail Mountain View and Altus included deviations from zoning standards and density limits.

The review covered historical approvals for developments like Vail Mountain View and Altus, which included deviations from standard zoning restrictions, allowing increased density and building heights. The master plan's recommendations for amendments to the high-density zone district were noted, highlighting a lack of updates to address non-conforming situations in Vail Village. Future redevelopment will likely require special development districts to comply with zoning and master plan guidelines.
Presentation of Architectural Site Plan and Building Height Considerations (04:27:50)
Architectural site plan reviewed with building height considerations based on town's guidelines.

The architectural site plan was presented, showing building orientation and height considerations. Building height has been a significant consideration in Vail Village's urban design, with the master plan suggesting taller structures around the village periphery. The proposal includes structures up to five to six stories, deemed appropriate for framing the village and serving as buffers. Historical files show precedents for such building heights, aligning with the conceptual building height plan adopted by the town.
Emergency Vehicle Access and Site Circulation Plans (04:30:24)
Emergency vehicle access plans detailed, including site circulation and fire department coordination.

The site circulation plan includes detailed paths for emergency vehicles, with two separate garage entrances. The coordination with the town's public works and fire department ensures compliance with emergency access requirements. The plan shows entrances, exits, and pedestrian pathways, highlighting changes needed for emergency access and the closure of certain access points as required by CDOT. The provision of loading and delivery spaces was also discussed.
Setback and Zoning Deviation Discussions (04:37:16)
Adjustments to setbacks and zoning deviations were presented, including increased parking spaces and revised setbacks.

The discussion covered adjustments to the building's setbacks and zoning deviations. Changes include moving the parking garage ramp six feet in from the property line and reconfiguring the parking layout to increase spaces. These changes were made in response to feedback and aim to align with town requirements while optimizing site use. The presentation included a review of landscape areas, including those on building rooftops, and how they mitigate visual impacts.
Building Height and Topography Impact on Design (04:42:51)
Building height considerations discussed, focusing on topography and design impact on redevelopment.

The presentation explored how topography affects building height and design. The site's slope allows for excavation and placement of two building stories below grade, mitigating height impact. Discussions highlighted the challenges and benefits of the steep slopes, with the design accommodating the natural terrain to minimize visual impact. The building's highest points were identified, showing how the site dips in the center, influencing the height measurements according to town standards.
Sun Shade Analysis Discussion (04:50:30)
Discussion on the sun shade analysis for the proposed Lunar Vail North building and its impact.

The meeting addressed concerns regarding the sun shade impact of the proposed Lunar Vail North building on the Vail Mountain View residences. It was noted that while the proposed building increases shading on the pool at certain times of the day and year, the primary shading impact comes from the Vail Mountain View residence building itself. The analysis was conducted continuously across every minute and hour of the day.
Mechanical Equipment Venting Concerns (04:52:00)
Concerns were raised about venting exhaust from mechanical equipment and potential impacts.

Concerns were raised by neighbors about mechanical equipment venting primarily from the proposed building. It was noted that exhaust would be vented through the roof, not the side of the buildings. A concern was expressed about the construction of buildings on the Apollo Park site causing exhaust from existing buildings to get trapped. The architects will conduct modeling to understand the impact.
Building Setbacks and Encroachments (04:55:29)
Discussion on building setbacks, encroachments, and reconfiguration of the parking garage ramp.

The area highlighted in blue on the plans shows the building's encroachments into the setback. The parking garage ramp has been reconfigured to pull it off the property corner by an additional five feet, mimicking the existing site wall.
Site Plans and Landscaping (04:58:09)
Presentation of site plans, landscaping, and related building elevations.

The presentation covered the landscape plans, site plans, and building elevations. The challenges of meeting minimum landscape requirements were discussed, as well as the design of the site to blend with adjacent properties.
Conditional Use Permit (05:02:52)
Discussion on the conditional use permit for Apollo Park residences.

It was noted that no existing conditional use permit could be found for the Apollo Park residences. An application for a conditional use permit was submitted, but the property has historically complied with the town code.
Public Benefits and Development Proposal (05:04:49)
Discussion on public benefits, development proposal, and zoning compliance.

The public benefits and the development proposal were discussed, including a fee in lieu payment for stream tract improvements and the provision of attached accommodation units. The compliance with the Vail Village master plan and review criteria was also highlighted.
Questions and Comments from Commissioners (05:10:03)
Discussion on live bed counts, building heights, and compliance with zoning regulations.

Commissioners asked questions about live bed counts, stepping of buildings according to the master plan, and current building heights. The compliance of the proposed development with zoning regulations and the impacts on adjacent properties were also discussed.
Discussion on Altus Development (05:22:07)
Discussion on the special development district needed for the Altus project, allowing deviations from HDMF standards.

The meeting discussed the Altus development project and how it required the creation of a special development district to deviate from the existing HDMF standards. Commissioners clarified the project details and concluded questions for the applicant.
Commissioner Questions (05:23:10)
Commissioners concluded their questions with no further inquiries at this time.

Commissioners asked final questions to the applicant regarding their presentation and expressed appreciation for the iteration. The session was concluded with no further questions from the commissioners.
Public Comment Period (05:24:16)
Public comments were heard regarding concerns on the Altus project, including traffic, height, and impact on surroundings.

During the public comment period, various stakeholders, including resident representatives and neighboring property owners, voiced their concerns about the Altus project. Issues raised included the height of the building, potential traffic increases, and the project's impact on surrounding properties and views. Comments were collected from both in-person attendees and online participants.
Public Comments on Apollo Park Redevelopment (05:55:23)
Residents express concerns about the Apollo Park redevelopment, citing zoning code exploitation and community impacts.

During the public comments section, several residents, including Harrison Haas and Karen Klayman, expressed their concerns about the proposed redevelopment of Apollo Park. They highlighted issues regarding the exploitation of zoning codes, the lack of community benefits, and the potential impact on the neighborhood's character. Concerns were also raised about traffic, building height, and the loss of landscaping.
Commissioner Comments on Apollo Park Redevelopment (06:17:18)
Commissioners discuss the Apollo Park redevelopment, emphasizing building height and community impact concerns.

Commissioners provided their comments on the Apollo Park redevelopment project. They expressed concerns about the building height, the mass and bulk of the proposed structures, and the potential impact on the community. The lack of stepping back from the frontage road and stepping down towards the creek was also discussed. They emphasized the need for better landscaping and respect for the Vail Village Master Plan.
Request for Continuance on Apollo Park Project (06:23:59)
A continuance is requested for the Apollo Park redevelopment project to address commissioners' feedback.

The applicant requested a continuance to address the feedback provided by the commissioners regarding the Apollo Park redevelopment project. The commissioners agreed to continue the discussion at a future meeting, allowing the applicant to make necessary adjustments to the project plan.
Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes (06:25:02)
The commissioners approve the minutes from the previous meeting with a quorum present.

The commissioners reviewed and approved the minutes from the previous meeting. With a quorum present, a motion was made and seconded, leading to the unanimous approval of the minutes.
Adjournment of Meeting (06:25:52)
The meeting is adjourned following a motion and a second by the commissioners.

After addressing all agenda items, the meeting was adjourned. A motion to adjourn was made and seconded, and the motion passed unanimously, concluding the meeting.

Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (9 Episodes)

Updated 4 days ago

This volunteer board is responsible for making recommendations to the Town Council on proposed legislation, master planning documents and Special Development Districts.