-
Looks like we are all here. All right,
-
So Megan, should I call
us to order again? Okay.
-
So good evening everyone,
-
and welcome to the July 11th,
2023 meeting of the Wellesley
-
Select Board.
-
This meeting may be viewed
by a live stream on Wellesley
media.org and viewed on
-
Comcast Channel eight
and Verizon Channel 40.
-
This is a Zoom meeting with the following
members of the Wellesley Select Board
-
present and participating remotely.
And Mara Lonza, Tom Felder,
-
Beth Sullivan Woods, Colette, o'
Frank, and myself, Lisa Olney.
-
So welcome everybody. Do we have
anyone for citizen speak? Megan?
-
We do not have anyone on the line
for citizen speak. Okay, awesome.
-
Everybody's outta town probably. Okay.
-
So the first item is
executive directors update.
-
I'll just say quickly
before Megan starts that,
-
I'm just gonna note for the board that
we're gonna be voting on the minutes at
-
our next regular meeting.
-
There were a number of substantive
changes proposed to the previous draft,
-
and just from a process standpoint,
-
we're gonna reissue the original draft
and any substantive changes should be
-
proposed at our next meeting as
amendments so that they can be clearly
-
considered by the board. So, Megan,
-
do you wanna proceed?
-
Sure. I had a couple announcements that
I wanted to make and then we just have
-
a gift to accept. So with
regards to announcements one,
-
this Saturday, July 15th
from nine 30 to four 30,
-
be the wildest Grand Merchant
Association's July jubilation.
-
And so the road on Central Street
will be closed during those that time.
-
Lots of activities and events, we
encourage everyone to check it out. Also,
-
on Thursday,
-
the Charles River Watershed Association
will be hosting a walking tour along
-
Fuller Brook, and as part of that,
-
you can contact or, or
join that it's at 10:00 AM
-
and they'll go through the,
-
how it recently restored the
tributary to the Charles River.
-
And then just a brief announcement from
Health Department of Communications
-
with our health director Lenny Zo, with
the amount of rain and heat we've had,
-
we just want to let people know that
comes about discussing mosquitoes that
-
our d pws out currently treating
our catch patients with Larvicide.
-
Timing of this treatment will give us
effective coverage at least through
-
August. In addition,
-
we want to remind residents to empty
any standing water on their property and
-
take personal protective measures
when outside, during dusk and dawn.
-
So with the amount of rain we've had,
when you have things outside buckets,
-
et cetera, that you forget,
-
just dump 'em out and that that helps
keep our mosquito population down.
-
So Lenny wanted me to
just relay that for folks.
-
And then we also had one
vote of a gift acceptance.
-
The Park Andry D division
received a donation of labor from
-
Hartney Graymont who celebrated Arbor
Day by working on the Town Station Oak.
-
The value of this was approximately
$5,000. So we, we think,
-
I actually went by the day
people were working on it,
-
and the Station Oak is our champion
tree right in front of the post office.
-
And it was pretty
substantial work that they,
-
they went and checked all the
cabling and did substantial pruning.
-
So thank you to them for that gift.
-
So we would just need an
acceptance of that from the board.
-
And well, if there are no
questions about the gift, Beth,
-
could we have the motion please? Sure.
-
Move to approve the gift from Hartney
Graymont of services that included
-
pruning, fertilizing,
-
and checking the cabling of the Town
Station Oak with an estimated value of
-
$5,000.
-
Second Amara. Aye.
-
Beth Aye. Tom. Aye.
-
Colette Aye. And I vote Aye as well.
-
I think that's it, right, Megan?
For the, for your update? Yes.
-
And so next thing is we're gonna vote
on the legal services agreement for
-
pfas litigation.
-
So Dave Cohen is joining us. Dave,
-
do you wanna give the board just
a brief update on this litigation?
-
Sure thing. And and before I do
that, I, I hope you don't mind,
-
and if you wouldn't mind
indulging me just to make a,
-
a brief sat announcement to let the board
and the community know that this past
-
weekend,
-
Paul de Phillips Park and Tree
assistant superintendent passed away
-
after a year long battle with cancer
and we're all very saddened by it.
-
And I just wanted to
mention that and, you know,
-
let Paul and his family know that, that
we're thinking of, of him and them,
-
and also Parks family here at Park
and Tree, who I know is really,
-
really thrilling from this. It's
been a, it's been a tough haul,
-
but Paul is finally at rest after
a, a, a, a, a really strong fight.
-
But he did pass away this weekend and
so wanted to just make mention of that.
-
So thank you for letting
me share that. Thank.
-
You Dave.
-
I just hope you'll convey to his
family how very sorry we are from the,
-
from the select board we're our
deepest sympathies to, to his family.
-
I will do that. Thank.
-
You. And to everyone, everyone at the
D P W who worked with him as well.
-
Of course.
-
Appreciate that. Thank you.
-
And Paul would want us to get right
back to business. So, so regarding pfas,
-
as, as you know, since the pfas
issue emerged a couple years ago,
-
we've been entertaining conversations
with various law firms about getting
-
involved in class action
litigation related to pfas.
-
And over, over the past
couple years, we've,
-
we've been through a few presentations
and interviews with some different firms
-
and we've finally come
to the point where we,
-
we are recommending to move forward
with SL Environmental Law Group and
-
Partners.
-
And so we have an agreement
for the board to consider that
-
would have,
-
have this law firm and their
related firms represent Wellesley
-
in any potential class action,
-
legal action or civil actions that
might take place related to pfas.
-
And we would be joining more
than a dozen Massachusetts
-
communities.
-
We'd be joining the state of Massachusetts
among others and over a hundred other
-
jurisdictions in, in the United
States that have jumped on with,
-
with this particular law
group. And we've done some,
-
some outreach and some reference
checking and, and feel,
-
feel good about entering into an
agreement with, with this group.
-
So we recommend favorable action from the,
-
from the select board on this and happy
to have any questions that you might
-
have.
-
Thank you, Dave.
-
So I'll just mention for the benefit of
the public that we did have a discussion
-
of this in executive session,
-
so a lot of the board's
questions I think were answered,
-
but if anyone has anything
additional they'd like to say,
-
now would be a good time. Okay.
-
Thank you so much Dave.
-
We really appreciate your pursuing
this on behalf of the town.
-
It's a matter of great
concern to everyone and
-
really glad that you're on top of this.
-
Lisa, Lisa, if you don't mind,
maybe it's also good to also
-
maybe set expectations
with folks that, you know,
-
people might be hearing reports
about lots of money that, that,
-
that might be out there. And, and I,
-
I think we wanna be conservative
about our expectations here, that,
-
that this is a low risk
but potentially low reward.
-
But we wanna make sure that if there are
any settlements that we don't miss out
-
on those opportunities.
-
But there may not be millions of
dollars coming our way on this,
-
but whatever it is, we want to take
advantage of that. And so this is,
-
this will protect our
interests in the event that,
-
that any dollars do become available.
-
Absolutely. Thank you. Okay. If,
-
if the board has no further comments,
we'll I'll ask for a motion please. Beth.
-
Move to approve the legal
services agreement for the pfas
-
action litigation and to authorize
executive director Megan job to sign on
-
behalf of the town.
-
Second Beth Aye. Tom Aye.
-
Colette Aye. And Mara Aye.
-
And I vote Aye as well.
Thank you very much, Dave.
-
Thank you all. Have a great night.
-
You too.
-
So we are going to move on to the
interview and vote of the interim fire
-
chief.
-
Thanks Lisa. So with us
tonight, in addition to the
candidates is Brian Duggan,
-
the town's consultant from
Municipal Resources Inc.
-
To assist the board with this
process. And in addition is Chief pki.
-
Chief PKI has been assisting me
through this process for both the
-
interim chief search as well as
our PR initial fire chief search,
-
which has led us here today. So with
that, it would be my expectation,
-
I'm gonna turn it over to Brian to give
an introduction and then the board has a
-
series of questions.
-
I think we'll after Brian's introduction
we'll turn it back to Lisa to,
-
to start off the questions and then
we can, we can take it from there.
-
Okay. Thank you Megan.
Can everyone hear me okay?
-
Okay. Yes.
-
Thank you. So again, as Megan said,
-
w we've sort of navigated
a path through a search and
-
recruited and interviewed two candidates
that are gonna come before the board
-
tonight as potential interim fire chiefs.
-
The first candidate is with
us. Ready? Todd Germaine.
-
So Todd, if you can hear me, why don't
you turn your mic on and your video
-
and we'll introduce him. So everybody.
-
Hi there.
-
Todd comes to us from
Portsmouth, New Hampshire,
-
where he served three years as
fire chief and emergency manager.
-
And in addition to that, he served
eight years as Shift Commander.
-
Prior to coming to you tonight,
-
Todd has interviewed with us and
with Megan and the chief on two
-
occasions, once with us and
once with our entire team,
-
including Megan and the chief and
was vetted through that process.
-
So he survived us. So we're, we're
hoping he can survive you as well.
-
Todd is actually traveling.
Todd, you're in London, correct?
-
Glasgow, Scotland.
-
So he is calling in quite
remotely and with that I'm sure
-
he'll say much more about his career
history as we go through things.
-
So I'll turn it over to the chair and
then we'll follow up with questions
-
afterwards. Lisa.
-
Great. Thank you Brian. And thank you
Chief lucky for being here as well.
-
So what we thought we'd do is
have the board members go around
-
sort of picking your top priority
questions from that great list that
-
we got from Brian of suggested questions.
-
And then if you have a follow-up question,
-
you could go ahead with
that and then we'll move on.
-
And then if we still have
time, hopefully we will,
-
Megan can go through the
remaining questions to the,
-
to the extent that we're able,
-
just a reminder that we'll be asking
both candidates the same questions.
-
So, so I will just start us off.
-
There were so many great questions
here. I, it was hard to choose, but I,
-
I'd really be grateful to hear Todd,
-
about your management style and how
you would approach the need for change
-
within the Wellesley fire department.
-
Sure. First of all, hello to everybody
and thanks for the opportunity to,
-
to be here tonight. As far as
my, my management style, I'm,
-
I'm very much a democratic type
of manager. I seek collaboration,
-
I seek input from,
-
from all stakeholders to the best
that I can. I've had a, a pretty,
-
pretty successful career both in, in as a,
-
as a firefighter and,
-
and a shift commander in my roles as union
-
executives as well as on this side of
the desk as a manager to be able to
-
facilitate communication and
collaboration between, you know,
-
particularly labor and management. And
that's, that's pretty much probably my,
-
my biggest strength and what I bring,
I think to the table in this situation.
-
As far as, as affecting change,
-
I'm not deeply familiar with the,
-
with the issues within the
Wellesley Fire Department,
-
just sort of on the surface. Obviously
there are some leading us to, you know,
-
the conversation tonight. But
as we figure out what those are,
-
I think I have an ability to, to bring
all sides to the table, so to speak,
-
and, and, and find some,
-
some common ground as far as
affecting change. Again, you know, it,
-
it starts at the top obviously,
-
but you gotta get the
middle management involved.
-
You gotta get the middle
management convinced that
the changes for the better of
-
them and the whole department.
And I think, you know,
-
that's for me the best place to
start. And, and also, you know,
-
from what I understand,
-
there's a good opportunity now cause
there's a lot of younger firefighters,
-
a lot of younger generation
coming through and they,
-
and they're almost the
majority. So I think, you know,
-
the more you can get that group of
people involved and and acceptable the
-
change, the, the easier
that change or the quicker,
-
at least that change may come. So.
-
Great. Well, thank you. So just to
make sure I heard you correctly,
-
you were saying your biggest strength
was essentially bringing all sides to the
-
table. Is that kind of.
-
Yeah, I've had very good luck
facilitating that communication with,
-
you know, with the department I I
worked in, there were two labor unions,
-
one for the firefighters and
one for the fire officers.
-
And then of course you
have the management.
-
And even prior to being
a chief in my role as,
-
as leaders of, of those
labor unions, I, I made a,
-
a concerted effort to,
-
to make sure that those lines of
communication from that side to the
-
management, you know, was always
open and, and and facilitated.
-
And then of course when I get on
this on the other side of the desk,
-
I carried through with that as well
to make sure that those lines of
-
communication were always
there. And I think, you know,
-
when you get all the stakeholders together
and you get 'em all sort of looking
-
in the, in the right direction,
-
in the same direction and that's when
things can positively change and you can
-
actually make a difference.
-
Awesome. Thank you very much.
-
So can I see hands for
who'd like to go next? Beth?
-
Great. Nice to meet you Mr. Ger. Hi.
-
Beth, nice to meet you.
-
So you are coming from
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, right?
-
Which is correct, a little
bit bigger of a department,
-
correct.
-
Little bit, not, not too much
bigger but a little bit bigger.
-
One additional station and
a few more people per shift.
-
So I'm wondering what are the differences
that you see between your most
-
recent position and the position of
interim chief in the town of Wellesley?
-
Well, I mean, the difference would be
in, in my position in Portsmouth, I,
-
you know, came up through the ranks.
I was intimately familiar with the,
-
with the department for,
you know, 30 years and,
-
and when became the chief, you know,
I had all that internal knowledge,
-
I had all that institutional
knowledge and history.
-
So obviously that would be a difference
coming to Wellesley. And also I think,
-
you know, from what I
understand there would be a,
-
a series of goals and objectives
as, as, as prescribed by,
-
I guess probably Megan and, and and
the board to find, you know, to,
-
to achieve or to, to accomplish
in the time that I'm there.
-
So I think it would be more
short term planning and goal.
-
Not that I wouldn't try to,
-
to facilitate and try to try to move
along some longer term, you know,
-
goals and management while
you're there. Cause you don't,
-
you don't want someone in there for a
year just to think about that one year.
-
You still have to, as the fire
chief, you still have to plan ahead.
-
You still have to be looking,
you know, at the horizon to,
-
to make sure that things are moving
forward in 2, 3, 5, 8 years. So, I mean,
-
you know, as, as the chief
in Portsmouth, you know,
-
that was sort of my focus vision
was that further, you know,
-
outlook and we're here, I think I would
have to concentrate as much, you know,
-
on the shorter term of those goals
and objectives, but also, you know,
-
making sure the department moves
forward in a, you know, in a,
-
in a futuristic situ, you know, futuristic
look as well. If that makes sense.
-
Sorry, it's, it's almost
midnight here, so.
-
It's okay. So Lisa, did you
wanna follow up now or wait? Yes,
-
so now would be good. Okay.
-
So I guess my follow up question
is what is it about this
-
position that has caused you to
apply for it and be interested?
-
To be honest, I was asked if I
would be interested in in, in,
-
in doing an interim stint
here by the folks from mri.
-
And honestly, I, I, you know,
-
I've been just about nine
months out from retirement,
-
my wife and I did a lot of traveling
over the winter and we're sort of,
-
you know, in a, a little bit
of a limbo state right now.
-
So it actually worked out
pretty nicely, you know,
-
the offer that when it came through.
So I mean, we're, you know, if we,
-
if it happens that, that I get
the position we'll be, you know,
-
looking for a place, you know, right
away down in that area to, to be,
-
to move to for the time
that I'm there. So that's,
-
that's really what got me interested.
And to be, I'll be honest, I I,
-
I miss, you know,
-
I miss I missed it a little bit and
in having these interviews with,
-
with I and, and with Megan and, and Chief
Eck, you know, getting back into the,
-
the thought of, of all this again,
it's kinda exciting. So I'm,
-
I'm looking forward to follow
through with it if possible.
-
Great. Thank you so much.
-
Welcome.
-
And Mara, thank you. And Todd,
-
thank you so much for taking the time
to meet with us today. You're welcome.
-
So Lisa stole my question, so I
have a different question. So how,
-
I guess how do you communicate with,
-
involve and motivate your staff and
preserve the command structure within the
-
organization?
-
And I think it would be helpful to
maybe if you had like maybe a specific
-
example of a situation
that you had to deal
-
with and how you worked
through it and were able
-
how you were able to use
your communication skills to
work through the situation
-
and at the end of the day, dealing
with the difficult situation,
-
still have a staff that was
motivated and ready to Sure.
-
It's, I'm trying to, it's a lengthy one,
but I'll try to trim it down for, for,
-
for brevity here.
-
We had a situation where we had
a promotion to make for, for a,
-
a lieutenant and there were only two
people left on the promotion list.
-
Policy dictated that I recommend to
our board of fire commissioners, one,
-
at least one person for the position.
-
And in my estimation and the
estimation of my shift commanders and
-
some outside references that neither
of these of these individuals should be
-
promoted for, for lack of a better
way to put it, for reasons of safety.
-
And, and so being responsible for
everyone in the department and,
-
and having the final say, at least
in my opinion, I had the final say.
-
I chose not to positively
recommend either one of them,
-
but before I did that I brought each
of them in, discussed, you know,
-
the issues that I had and the, the ship
commanders had with them and, you know,
-
face-to-face with, you know, and said
right up front, this is, you know,
-
this is what I'm not going
to do and what I'm gonna do.
-
I brought their union presidents in and
told 'em the same thing and, you know,
-
the reasons that I was going
to do so, and you know, I,
-
I offered them sort of a
threw of a way out of it.
-
They chose not to take it, they
chose to instead file a grievance,
-
went to a lengthy arbitration
over a year. But, you know,
-
the whole, the whole time we had open
communications, but I wasn't trying to,
-
to subvert anybody. I wasn't
trying to go around anybody or,
-
or didn't do anything behind his
back or, or anything like that.
-
I wanted to make sure that they
were upfront as to why one of the,
-
the individuals actually took, you know,
-
the advice that we gave him and pretty
much turned himself around and to the
-
point now he's actually sitting as the
next person to be promoted up there from
-
what I understand. And then the other
person went the other way and, and,
-
and oftentimes and repeatedly
seems to prove, you know,
-
that we did, we made the right
decision, I think. But anyway,
-
and in the end, we, we won the ar
the city won the arbitration. They,
-
they sided with, with myself, you know,
-
making the right decision or had having
the ability to make that decision.
-
And you know, when it was all over,
-
it was shortly before I retired and one
month after the arbitration case came
-
through, both unions voted to,
-
to make me honorary lifetime
members of their union.
-
So I'm not sure how to take that,
but seemed to work out on my end. So,
-
but that, if that's a, if that's
an example as to what I could,
-
how I communicated, if,
if that helps. Yeah.
-
No, that's a great example. Thank you.
-
And so it sounds like in that case you
ended up with an employee who maybe was
-
not very motivated and was maybe
a little unhappy for that year.
-
Was that a challenge that you had to
deal with or is that something that was
-
dealt with, you know, lower
down the chain of command?
-
It was dealt with more of
the lower chain of command.
-
This person was a bit of
an outlier. So I don't,
-
I don't know as if it really, it didn't
really spread throughout the department,
-
but you know, the other
person who, you know,
-
really just sort of turned around and,
and became more involved and, you know,
-
that that's that motivation, I
mean, flipped him around, you know,
-
and I think he,
-
he was pretty upfront about not realizing
that those were the reasons that were
-
holding him up. And when he
did realize it, you know,
-
he did the right thing and, and
he took and he took off with it.
-
The other person unfortunately
dug their heels in. But again,
-
it didn't really affect anyone because
everyone else in the department saw the
-
same thing that we did. So.
-
Okay. Well thank you so much.
-
You're welcome.
-
Tom.
-
Thank you. And thank you for joining us,
-
given the hour. We've had this experience
with another member of our board too,
-
and it's not,
-
not easy and basically in a situation
like this where you're interviewing,
-
so we really appreciate it. The,
-
the whole concept of an interim chief,
-
I think has been interesting and seems
to have grown organically out of our
-
work with M R I and an evaluation of their
-
sense along with our
management team and chief pki
-
about where the department
needs to go as a result in the
-
recommendation for a 12 month term.
-
I think it puts a lot of
pressure on organization and goal
-
orientation in terms of what
needs to be accomplished.
-
So how would you work with the M R I
team to determine progress on goals
-
and objectives and support an
officer development program?
-
So from what I understand, again,
there'll be goals and objectives and,
-
and I think if it's not the plan,
-
I would suggest the plan to be
that we meet, if not, you know,
-
monthly or quarterly to find out where
we are at with those objectives with,
-
with MRI and probably with
Megan to find out, you know,
-
to see where it is we're at, see how
the, you know, how the progress is,
-
is moving along. You know,
-
really the first few months is gonna be
me getting to know them and them getting
-
to know me. To your
earlier point, you know,
-
I'm not really familiar with
interim, an interim position.
-
This is is a new thing for me.
It doesn't really happen much,
-
it doesn't seem to have happened
much anyway in New Hampshire.
-
I I actually know a couple of chiefs
that have done it and spoken with them
-
briefly as to, you know,
process and so on. But
-
I, I think that's, I think
that's the plan is to,
-
is to just be in constant contact. And
I think I would be in a a, you know,
-
a weekly or, or more than a few times
a week communication with Megan,
-
at least to begin with, to make
sure that, you know, we're,
-
we're headed in the right direction,
-
that we're heading in
the right direction and,
-
and her eyes and in the eyes of the
board for sure. You know, I think,
-
you know, my goal is gonna
be to, to find or, or to,
-
I think from what I understand, there's,
-
there's internal candidates that are
capable of taking this position if given,
-
you know, the opportunity to do so or
perhaps you know, the right direction.
-
And, you know, in my, in my years
in the fire service, you know, I,
-
I I believe that these, these le the
leadership should come from within.
-
I think it, I think it's best for the
organization that, you know, that,
-
that the leadership comes from within
and moves their way up through.
-
So as far as I'm concerned,
my position here is,
-
is gonna be to foster that and
to, to, to make that happen.
-
To find that person or,
-
or that person's already identified
and bring them along up through.
-
I think that internal knowledge and
that internal rise up through the
-
ranks is what's best for the
organization as a whole in the end.
-
Thank you. Welcome.
-
I think it's left to me the,
-
the Scottish member of the board who
has been in your position before.
-
So I appreciate your, the middle
of the night in my hometown.
-
It, it's okay.
-
It's so easy to stay up here cause it
doesn't get dark till like 10 30, so.
-
It does not, yeah, just try it
in the middle of winter though,
-
when it's dark at three
in the afternoon. Yeah.
-
No, no, I'm not gonna do that.
-
Well, thank you for your time today
and I appreciate your answers already.
-
Some of my top questions
have already been selected,
-
so I would like to ask
you to talk maybe about a
-
deeper dive into your 90 day plan and
-
what are some specific projects that
you would like to collaborate with your
-
staff to bring positive change
to the Wellesley Fire Department?
-
What are two top two examples of something
you might focus on in the initial 90
-
day period?
-
Sure. Well, in addition to, you know,
-
getting my bearings in Wellesley
and within the department,
-
certainly I would, you know, in the
first week to 10 days, week to two weeks,
-
I would want to meet with the
command staff, my command staff.
-
It was immediately below the
chief. And then with the,
-
the senior staff as far
as the shift commanders,
-
the deputies meet with the
union presidents or president,
-
I'm not sure how many unions
have there meet with, you know,
-
the union leadership and get everybody
sort of at least face to face and,
-
and try to, and try to get everyone on
the same page to see which way, you know,
-
which way we're gonna go from
there. I think, you know,
-
as far as as things we could
do in the department, you know,
-
a good exercise,
-
which would be a good exercise
for potential leaders in
-
the department as well as good
for the department is, you know,
-
put together a a five-year plan
if one doesn't exist already,
-
which can be good not only, you
know, in the, in the short term for,
-
for the purposes that of the interim
situation in the development of,
-
of leadership, but also in the long
term. You know, it can be used, you know,
-
in years to come for planning and
budgeting and so on, you know,
-
that would help any department. And
there's also there, there, you know,
-
we've done self assessments before in
our departments before where, you know,
-
you sort of just gather all the, all the
data and all the facts, you know, and,
-
and put 'em into one document that sort
of is a sort of a snapshot of where
-
you're at now, where you
have been and you know,
-
where we look to go in the
future in addition to, you know,
-
that would be separate from like
a five year, you know, planning,
-
planning document outside of that. Or
it could be a 10 year planning document,
-
what what have you. But
I just think, you know,
-
I was thinking that earlier that that
would be a good exercise or something to
-
do again for, you know, the
immediate situation that we're in,
-
but also would benefit something that
we could do that would also benefit the
-
department to have on file
anyway, you know, for the future.
-
Thank you. And I'm gonna use as my
follow up, I'm gonna ask you to ask,
-
talk a little bit more about budgeting
and what of experience you've had in
-
trying to, you know, evaluate
a, a department's budget,
-
find where there might
be gaps, like you said,
-
build into a five-year plan. Tell us
more about your experience with that.
-
Experience with budgeting. You know,
just, I, I don't, I would have to get,
-
I would have to sit down with,
-
with Megan for a couple hours
to go over town budgeting.
-
I'm not too familiar with,
you know, how a town,
-
especially Massachusetts
would do that. I'm, you know,
-
I'm sure it's something
pick up easy enough.
-
But as far as my budgeting experience
with city budgets, you know,
-
our budget cycle started in November,
you know, or our October of, you know,
-
the year to, to follow up for the
July one beginning of the fiscal year.
-
So our budget process were pretty long.
-
It started with capital budget
processing. I was able to actually,
-
my first year as chief, I was
able to find a way to stagger our,
-
we had to replace two ladder
trucks within a couple of years.
-
I was able to evaluate one and get it to,
-
to a position and get it refurb to a
point where it could last long enough that
-
we could purchase just
one aerial truck for,
-
to run first do for 10 years and then
keep that other one reserved for 10 years,
-
save the city, you know, a couple million
dollars and spread out the cost of,
-
you know, having two aerial ladder truck
purchases within a couple years. So,
-
I mean, it seems like there's
always things we can find
in gaps there. And then,
-
you know, budgeting is always
looking back to find out, you know,
-
what you've spent before and
you know, what, what you,
-
what you can try to not
spend the next time.
-
We had around a nine and a half to
$10 million budget when I left. So,
-
and you know, and I think it's, if it's
no different here, I'm sure you know,
-
your personnel and, and the fixed
costs are up in probably the high 80%,
-
you know, early 90%. So, you know,
-
your discretionary spending and things
that you have a lot of room for is pretty
-
small, but, you know, anything you
can find in there is, is a savings.
-
And you know, certainly that's, you
know, that's what we always look forward,
-
you know, look, look to do
is find those savings in the,
-
in the places that we can,
that we have any control over.
-
Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate
your approach to smoothing out costs and,
-
you know, appropriately budgeting
for capital items. So thank you.
-
You're welcome.
-
Megan, do we,
-
so I think we have a little
more time, right? Yeah.
-
It should be seven 20.
-
The next candidate should be jumping on.
-
Okay. So Megan, do you wanna just go
through some of the other questions?
-
Sure. Hold on.
-
I'm just scrolling back
up to my questions.
-
What are some examples, Todd,
-
of things that you could do to make this
in intern position and intern internal
-
mentorship a success.
-
Again, without knowing a lot
of the internal, you know,
-
nuts and bolts of the
situation, I guess from, if I'm,
-
if I remember it correctly or if I get
the sense that there are candidates or
-
candidate internally that have, you know,
a good look at being in this position,
-
working just closely with,
-
with that person or those
people on a day-to-day basis.
-
It's the best of my ability or the
best of their ability depending on the
-
schedule and the shift. And
just, you know, to me, and,
-
and, and I was, I did this in
Portsmouth when I had a, a new,
-
I had a assistant fire chief,
my assistant fire chief retired.
-
I had a new one come up through who
was a shift captain at the time,
-
which would be a deputy in your
department. And you know, we,
-
we worked together on a lot of things
before that person even became the
-
assistant chief so that they could
seamlessly walk into that position when,
-
you know, the other person retired. And
that was just a matter of, you know,
-
if I had, like, if I had a
budget presentation to make
or if I had, you know, a,
-
a meeting, a commission
meeting of some kind or a or,
-
or a committee meeting to
invite that person along,
-
bring them into my office and, you know,
-
work on a document together or work on a
PowerPoint together just to get a sense
-
of, you know, this is, this is what it
is, this is what being a fire chief is.
-
It's, you know, it's
making this PowerPoint on,
-
on this budget presentation or
whatever. And or just bring,
-
I brought 'em in and like, listen, here's,
you know, here's our capital budget,
-
here's our capital outlay. You know, what,
what do you have for ideas? You know,
-
I don't, I don't have all the
answers. So I think, you know,
-
if we identify that person and bring
that, and I can do that with that person,
-
that's how I would like
to, to play this just,
-
just to be as transparent and open as
possible with this person and essentially,
-
you know, not get to the point,
-
but for lack of a better way to put
it co-chief with this person and,
-
and get the feel for whether they're
getting the feel for it or not, or just,
-
you know, I can say that, you know, if
they, if they have an idea, I'd be like,
-
well, yeah, I can see where that works,
-
but I can tell you in this
experience where it didn't work,
-
maybe we need to tweak it a
little bit to make it work into,
-
into what your idea might
be. Does that make sense?
-
That's great. One other
important factor is,
-
I know having been chief that
in a very visible location in
-
the imports that where the
firehouse happens to sit,
-
you had significant engagement
with the community. Yeah.
-
So even in a one year interim
position, what are some strategies or,
-
or ways that you would be able to engage
with the residents of the community and
-
involve the community?
-
Yeah, I mean to, to the
extent that you can and,
-
and I'm not sure what has already
been, you know, done there or what,
-
what happens now for community
engagement. But you know, there's,
-
there's always, you know,
-
social clubs or senior
citizen organizations or
-
you know, the schools or obviously
a good way to do it, just,
-
just being out there,
you know, if there's a,
-
if there's an event going on that
it's appropriate or, or even remotely,
-
appropriate to have a firetruck at
or a fire prevention person or myself
-
or whatever to be at, then you have
to be at those things, you know,
-
I mean like touch a truck
or type thing, you know,
-
if there's something like that going
on, you know, we should be there.
-
The fire department should be there. I
think, you know, and it's the matter of,
-
you know, getting, I I, I
was a proponent of, you know,
-
if if the crew wants to go out and
park the truck down on, you know,
-
on the downtown and go walk over
and get a coffee, coffee shop,
-
then they should do that because,
you know, it gets them out there.
-
People ask them questions maybe, you know,
-
they give directions to somebody
and it's a positive impact,
-
it's a positive experience there with
the public. I'm all for that. And in,
-
in the past they think, you know, in my
experience anyway, we've had, you know,
-
chiefs and, and leadership that, you know,
-
that wasn't allowed and that was
discouraged and, you know, it just,
-
to me it just seemed
counterintuitive to what you,
-
what we do and why we're
there. You're community. We're
-
know, reach out and ask a question or
you know, look at the truck, you know,
-
if a kid gets a, i, you know, get a
chance to step on a fire truck, you know,
-
that's a positive experience. You know,
the parents realize that. And, you know,
-
anytime you can get good, good face
value like that, you gotta do it.
-
So I mean that's, those
the kind of things that,
-
at least that's my philosophy
as far as that's concerned.
-
Great. Thanks again. If you're good,
-
I'll do the next two and then
swap back to you. Great. Okay.
-
So Todd, thinking about sort
of things that guide you,
-
what are three principles that would
guide you as an interim chief and
-
Wellesley, and why do they
stand out based on your career,
-
your life experience?
-
Well, honesty and integrity
and, and you know,
-
just a good work ethic. I mean, you know,
-
I guess I, I don't really know
how else to put that. I mean,
-
those are pretty obvious
things that again, you know,
-
be being honest with
everyone and, and, and, and,
-
and being able to establish
that honesty, which,
-
which leads to integrity in the
department. Again, you know, that's,
-
that's how I was a successful fire
chief in Portsmouth. And you know,
-
in know, well I guess, you know,
well respected as I was there was,
-
I was honest with everyone and, and
then I did develop that integrity and,
-
you know, and the work ethic is
there as well. You know, be there,
-
be there every day, be it
all the functions, be it the
things you need to be at,
-
you know, and, and, and, and keep your
face out there and, and, you know,
-
just get dirty beside what you have to,
you know, that's just part of the deal.
-
And you know, those, I guess, you know,
those are the, the principles. I mean,
-
you know, I grew, I grew up in, in
Northern New Hampshire, you know, and,
-
you know, you know, dad made
sure I worked for my dad.
-
Any of you out there worked for
your parents, you know, in the past.
-
But it's not always easy. And, you
know, one thing I learned was, you know,
-
if you wanted a day's pay, put in a
day's work. And I just, that's how I've,
-
I've lived through my career and I think,
you know, it's gotten me to where I,
-
where I was or, you know,
hope to be again someday.
-
Okay, thank you.
-
What would be your approach to a
couple of issues? First of all,
-
diversity in the Wellesley Fire Department
and recruitment of new firefighters
-
in a sort of very quickly
changing job market.
-
Yeah, we hit on the, you hit
on the number one, you know,
-
challenge of fire departments
around the world right now is,
-
is recruitment and retention and, and
you know, to some extent diversity,
-
just, there's an article in the
globe today about, you know,
-
hiring people on the cape,
-
unable to hire fire firefighters to work
in the departments that they, you know,
-
or to live in the towns of the departments
they work in. And you know, that's,
-
that's common all over the place now,
as, as housing becomes more expensive,
-
you know, we, we had those
issues in Portsmouth. Again,
-
it's just a high rent area and you know,
we weren't paid very well at the time.
-
And so, you know, we really had to
just put the word out for recruitment,
-
you know, everywhere. Not just in the
local papers or in the local, you know,
-
trade magazine or whatever. You
had to put it out everywhere.
-
You had to bring everybody in and gotta
the point where cold called people.
-
And you know, also part of that is,
you know, to improve diversity was to,
-
is to get out with the
publications that target, you know,
-
the more diverse populations. And,
you know, I'm happy to say that in my,
-
in my time as the chief,
-
we were recognized by the state of New
Hampshire having the most gender diverse
-
fire department in the state by having
five female firefighters, you know, by,
-
so by percentage. And it was only five,
but we were the largest, you know,
-
percentage in the state.
-
And I'm also very proud of being
able to promote the first female
-
lieutenant in the history of our
department and was able to mentor her and,
-
and bring her to a point where,
you know, she was, she became,
-
she got first on the lieutenant's test
and I was so happy to promote her. So,
-
but as far as, you know, the recruitment
stuff and retention, you know,
-
the recruitment, you gotta get more, you
know, the word out there and retention,
-
you gotta, you know,
-
obviously money's the number one thing
that brings people in and keeps 'em
-
there. But, you know, when
you've exhausted that avenue,
-
you gotta sort of add value to the, to
the job. And you gotta make it a more,
-
you know, pleasant place to work. The,
the years and the days of, you know,
-
tormenting, you know, the new
firefighters and, you know, and,
-
and that sort of thing is, is it's
just, it's not acceptable anymore. And,
-
and as far as I'm concerned, it needs
to go by the wayside. If it hasn't yet,
-
you know, you need to be able to
positively reinforce, you know, these,
-
these younger firefighters
when they come in,
-
they're a completely different generation.
-
They think of a completely different
way than we did when we came in.
-
And I think, you know,
-
when the leadership needs to spread
that word to the middle management,
-
to the captains or the, the
lieutenants and the deputies, you know,
-
to foster that relationship that, you
know, these new firefighters need,
-
need your help, they need your mentoring.
You know, if they have questions,
-
answer 'em, you know,
-
don't just tell 'em to do something
because you told 'em to do it. Just,
-
ask 'em to do something and explain
to them why you're asking to do that.
-
And I think, you know, that goes a
long way to retention. If they're,
-
if they're happy there,
then they'll stay there.
-
Okay. And sort of a,
-
a final follow up part of you
mentioned there's a number of new
-
firefighters, and that's
certainly the case in Wellesley.
-
How do you as chief prepare these
new firefighters to sort of get
-
ready for a changing future of
the fire service in America?
-
Be upfront with 'em. You
know, tell 'em, you know,
-
you gotta make sure they understand,
you know, what the, what the job is. I,
-
I hired I think a dozen firefighters
in my time as chief in Portsmouth. And,
-
and a few of them after a few
months realized, you know,
-
for whatever reason that this wasn't,
this wasn't their thing. And you know,
-
I didn't, if they came
in and said, you know,
-
we gave me a reason why they didn't
think it was their thing, you know,
-
I didn't encourage them to
stay if they felt, you know,
-
that strongly about it because, you
know, I think at that point, if, if it's,
-
if you don't like it now, it's
not gonna get any better for you.
-
So you gotta be honest with 'em. And
you know, and unfortunately you do,
-
you do lose a few that way. But, you
know, in, in the interview process,
-
bringing them in, you know, you really
hammer home, you know, what the job is,
-
what the, you know, what the commitments
are and you know, and, and, and the,
-
the risks involved. And, and,
and then when they're, you know,
-
when they're on the shift again, you
gotta sort of, you gotta keep the,
-
the line officers in the
middle management, you
know, on a, on a course of,
-
you know,
-
just better communication
and better relationships
with the younger firefighters
-
so that, you know, they, it's their job
to tell them and to explain to them,
-
you know, what the job is and, and
coach them and train them, you know,
-
and bring them along. So again,
just impress upon that, you know,
-
those deputies and lieutenants
that, you know, they, you, you're,
-
you're there to help them, you're there
for them. And, you know, I guess that's,
-
that's how I would do that. You know,
-
it's not something that the sheep is
gonna go down and talk to every new
-
firefighter on the floor, you know, and
convince him to stay or not stay. Right.
-
So.
-
Okay. Thank you. Megan, you
wanna take the next two?
-
There's more.
-
Just a few.
-
So we maybe have time for, I'd say it's
seven 17. Brian, what do you think? One,
-
one more?
-
Yeah, why don't we do one more.
-
Cause we've done these out of
order. I gotta look, hold on.
-
So although this is a, you
know, a a shorter stay,
-
why don't you discuss how you've
engaged with the other departments
-
in, in Portsmouth and how you would go
about engaging with the departments here.
-
It's, it's through the other
departments within the town chair.
-
When I first became the chief, the,
-
the manager of the city sort of sort of
-
got the department heads in a position
where they've sort of competed against
-
each other. So, and then we had a
change of, of leadership at the,
-
at the city manager level. And,
and then we had Covid and you know,
-
we went from a position of sort of having
our own little islands within the city
-
everybody's on the same island and we
better start figuring things out cause the
-
water's rising, right? So we were able to,
-
to have to collaborate together and
have to get together and do things and,
-
and that, you know, once, you know,
COVID waned and, and, and started to end,
-
we found that, you know,
-
we had much better working
relationships and things were, you know,
-
just all of our, all of our
situations were, were much,
-
much better because we meshed
together. We knew each other more,
-
we knew each other better. And you
know, we, we were just, especially with,
-
you know, public works and PD and,
-
and we worked a lot
with our senior center,
-
we with the senior citizens through
the vaccine stuff. But, you know,
-
as far as specific examples, you
know, I'm not sure just every day,
-
I mean every day situations
we, you know, like our,
-
our D P W handles the
hydrants, so, you know, does,
-
does the hydrants and we obviously,
we use the hydrants all the time. So,
-
you know, just being able to pick
up the phone and say, Hey, listen,
-
our guys are gonna be out
training, you know, at, you know,
-
on whatever avenue Richards Avenue
today, you know, just, just so you know,
-
we're gonna be flowing a few thousand
gallons of water, whatever, you know,
-
that that kind of stuff didn't exist
before. We would just go do it.
-
They'd find out about it, they'd
get upset and we'd be like, Hey,
-
we gotta do it. And now it's, you know,
like, pick up the phone and talk to 'em.
-
Just, you know, pick up and do it.
And, you know, and obviously, you know,
-
and our position, we, we, we deal with
finance all the time in HR and you know,
-
I I, I had no problem picking up the
phone and, and calling HR and saying,
-
listen, this is my situation. I need
some help with this person, you know,
-
help me out. And, and they're more
than happy to help out. So I mean, I'm,
-
I'm not afraid to pick up the phone
and say, you know, I need this and,
-
you know, anything I can do for
you, let me know and I'll, I'll,
-
I'll bend over backwards to make
sure that I can, can do what I can.
-
Okay, that's great. Thank
you. And Todd, just a,
-
a follow up to be clear with the
board, I know you're traveling,
-
when do you get back and when could you
start? So the board understands that.
-
So we're, we're due to come
back after the, what's the day?
-
The 12th of the 13th, I think
of August. So, you know,
-
anytime after that would be, would be
best. I mean, we, I could move that up, I,
-
if we had to, but you know, we,
we could discuss that, I think,
-
you know. Okay. If, if it came to it.
-
Sounds good.
-
Okay.
-
And that's of August,
by the way, so, yeah.
-
Yeah.
-
So Brian, it that's, that's it,
right? We're gonna move on now and,
-
and with great thanks to you, Todd,
-
for joining us and
particularly given the, the,
-
the hour of the day or the hour
of the night there in, in Glasgow.
-
But thank you very much.
We really appreciate it.
-
It's been great to hear
what you have to say.
-
You're welcome. Very nice
meeting you all. Thank you.
-
And Todd, Dave or I will be back
in touch with you as we go forward,
-
so thank you. Obviously you're
free to log off at this time.
-
Okay, thank you. Good night folks. Bye.
-
Good night.
-
Okay, through the chair.
-
Does the board wanna take a quick break
or go right into the next candidate
-
who is, is here?
-
Yeah, I think we wanna go
right into the next candidate.
-
Okay. So I believe Dave Sore has
joined us. Dave, if you can hear me,
-
why don't you turn on your video and
there we go. Good evening, how are you?
-
Good, how you doing Brian? Good, good.
-
So let me introduce you
to the board once again.
-
Dave has gone through a
similar process as Todd.
-
He's had two interviews for
the purpose of screening.
-
One with just Dave Houghton and myself,
and then a second both with the,
-
the chief and Megan and my team.
-
So he's been vetted through that
process and once again survive,
-
Dave comes to you with 22 years
experience as a mass fire chief,
-
which can, can be important for a
law and regulation. I know there,
-
there were some things that
Todd had mentioned on that,
-
but 14 years in Weston as
chief and eight years in sto.
-
And I'm sure we're gonna hear from Dave
much more about his career as we get
-
going. So I'll turn it to
the chair to start the,
-
the questions and then Megan and I
will pick up the questions after that.
-
Thank you very much and and
welcome Dave and thanks so much for
-
joining us on this hot night. Thank you.
-
So just a reminder to the board that
we're gonna be asking the same questions
-
that we asked before. So I
will just go back to asking
-
about your management style
and how you would approach
-
the need for change with the, within
the Wellesley Fire department.
-
Obviously any transition brings about
a lot of change and so just interested
-
in how, how you would approach that.
-
Yeah, it does bring a lot when you have
to do, when you have to make changes,
-
I would probably take some, a
little bit of time when they're,
-
I've worked with people, I
don't know them personally,
-
but I've worked with Wellesley fire
department, I kinda, I know the in,
-
I know how they operate. So I
would go in, do some evaluations,
-
see, see what needs to
be changed. I know a few,
-
few things were discussed
in the early interviews.
-
Then you bring the changes to your command
staff and to all the members of the
-
department. I think I would try to
meet with, with each one of the groups,
-
explain to them what the changes
are, why we're making the changes.
-
I would take their feedback cuz again, I
don't know everything there is to know,
-
but at the end of the day it is
my decision as to why, you know,
-
we're going to make,
-
make the changes that we're
going to make and then then you,
-
you implement the changes
and you try to do it
-
as smoothly as you can. I
mean, some things are gonna go,
-
I've had some things that went
very well. They, the, you know,
-
the transition was great. It wasn't an
issue. There were other things that,
-
you know, were an issue that we had
to work out the bugs and, you know,
-
I had to work with the union on some
stuff and just continue to keep an open
-
line and communication and be transparent
as to what we're doing and why
-
we're doing it.
-
Great, thank you.
-
So if you had to name your
greatest strength, what,
-
what would you say it it is in
terms of your management style?
-
I think my ability to get
people to, to do what,
-
what needs to be done. I like to,
I have a really positive attitude.
-
I lead by example. I'm
compassionate. You know,
-
I, I I had lunch with the guys I
know and, and the females. I would,
-
you know, I would listen to everybody,
you know, get to know them as a person,
-
get to, I built my trust with
them so that they would, you know,
-
they felt comfortable talking
to me about things. And I,
-
I think, aside from my fireground
side of it, which I think is probably,
-
I'm pretty, I'm very strong on
the fire, on the fire side of it,
-
the management in the station is,
-
is my ability to read
and work with people and
-
get people all on the same page
and going in the same direction.
-
Thank you very much.
-
So I am just looking to see who's
next. Beth, I believe you were.
-
Next. I am so welcome. Thank you.
Thank you for joining us tonight.
-
My question is, you've
been in Weston a long time,
-
so when you think about the
differences between your most recent
-
position in Weston and the position of
interim chief in the town of Wellesley,
-
how would you characterize
the key differences.
-
There? Really, honestly, there's
not a whole lot of differences.
-
Wellesley and Weston are very much alike.
-
Wellesley is a little bit bigger cuz
you're running, there's a 59, you know,
-
person. We were 30, 36.
-
We both had two stations run wise.
We're a little bit busier than we were,
-
but the cha the characteristics
of the town and the job
-
for the most part is pretty much
the same. You know, it's the same.
-
You have to get in, you have
to get to know everybody.
-
You've gotta get to what makes people
tick, what you know, what what they do,
-
what they like to do and
things like that. But as,
-
as far as Wellesley and Weston there,
-
there's really not a big
difference between the two.
-
And as a follow-up,
-
can you tell us what is it
about this opportunity that has
-
drawn you to apply and
why are you interested?
-
I retired last July with the
intention of, I had been there,
-
you know, for 22 years as the chief,
14 years in Weston. And there were,
-
there were a lot of problems in Westin
when I first got there, but we, we,
-
it was in a really good
place. I had mentored,
-
we hired a deputy and I had brought him
along to the point that he was ready
-
take my position and we had
brought somebody up that would,
-
that would be able to fall into the
deputy's position. We had people,
-
when I first went there, we had nobody,
-
people were not taking the exam
to get promoted. When I left,
-
I think there was, I
forget the exact number,
-
but if there was 15
people that were eligible,
-
like 12 of the people that
were eligible took the exam.
-
So there was,
-
things were in a really good
place and I did wanna touch base
-
with, you know, a company like Brian's
and do either interim Chiefing,
-
whether it is in Massachusetts or
not, but I, I just took a year,
-
I had a couple surgeries on my shoulders.
-
I had those fixed and this
opportunity presented itself and
-
it's a good opportunity. I know,
I don't know all the, you know,
-
the whole town of Wellesley,
I can, you know, I,
-
I don't know all the streets in it,
but I'm pretty familiar with the town.
-
I'm very familiar with the area,
-
I'm very familiar with how things in this
area work, all the chiefs in the area.
-
So it just seemed like
it was a really good fit.
-
Great. Well thank you
for your consideration.
-
Thank you.
-
And Mara, thank you Lisa.
-
And thank you so much David
for coming to this evening.
-
Make yourself available for the board
to meet you. Thank you for having me.
-
So I'm wondering about
communication and how,
-
how do you communicate with,
-
involve and motivate your staff
and preserve the chain of command
-
or the command structure within
your organization, and maybe a,
-
a specific example of a challenge that
you faced with your staff and how you
-
used your communication skills
to resolve that challenge and,
-
and at the end of the day,
have a motivated staff,
-
even though you had to deal
with something difficult.
-
I, I have an open door policy.
I, I will, you know, let,
-
people can come in, I can talk to people.
They have a problem. They can bring,
-
they can bring the problem to me. Depend,
you know, depending on what it is,
-
if it's a, if it's a small group problem,
-
they have to follow the chain of
command, and I make sure that,
-
that I comu i will com I would
communicate that as soon as I got there,
-
that there was a command structure.
You'd have to follow the,
-
the chain of command. And then for, you
know, for other, you know, other issues.
-
Like I said, I had an open
door policy. I did, I had to,
-
I did have to work with my command
staff because as we all know,
-
sometimes I would put a memo out
to change something, you know,
-
and my shift captain would say he,
he would be asked by his group, well,
-
we're doing this because the
chief said, so. I'm like, well,
-
that's not the answer that
you have to give them.
-
You have to sell them on what you are
doing. And they have to buy into it.
-
And they have to be able to communicate
down to the subordinates why we're doing
-
it that they've bought in. And that,
-
that way you can start to get
buy in all the way down the line.
-
So it starts at the top with me being
able to talk to my direct supervisors who
-
are going to go to the subordinates
and explain to them what we're doing,
-
why we're doing it, and how the
message needs to be put out there.
-
You can't just come out and say, well,
the chief wants it done. Okay, well,
-
why does the chief want it done? Well,
just because he wants it done there,
-
there has, they're gonna ask questions.
There has to be a reason why.
-
So thank you. So, just as a
follow up can, do you have,
-
can you share a specific example
of a time when that didn't
-
go so well and you had to
-
work with maybe a particular member of
your staff who was disappointed in the
-
way the decision that you made and how
you work them through that so that at the
-
end of the day,
-
they were motivated and ready to go back
to work as a firefighter and do the job
-
they needed to?
-
I think one of the bigger ones when I
first got there was the radio system.
-
I was kind of told that they
had a radio system that was very
-
dysfunctional. I had
to make it work. So we,
-
we began the process with a vendor.
We started working on things and I I,
-
there was a few people there that were,
-
They knew radios, but they
weren't like radio technicians.
-
So any change that I was making,
-
there were always bumps along the way
and things that had to be worked out.
-
We went from, we took the
bells out of the station,
-
we went to a different alerting system,
you know, thing, things like that.
-
We took out the street boxes that, that
did not go over big with the members,
-
but I had to explain to them that,
you know, this system is here.
-
It's costing the town X
amount of money. It is very,
-
very rarely used today was
cell phones and, you know,
-
the modern technology.
-
And I explained how the new system
was gonna work as they were a little
-
It was a mesh system that had repeater
systems where you could get around the
-
town and, and it took time and it,
-
it just took continuing to work
on the process and making sure
-
that it got done and it was done
properly. And it, it worked.
-
It, but it took, it took
time. And, you know,
-
I don't take those things personal.
It's, it's part of my job. I have,
-
they have to be done. So,
-
and we sold it and it worked
and it worked out. Good.
-
All right. Thank you so much, Tom.
-
Thank you. And thank you for
joining us tonight, David.
-
As others have said before,
me and I, you know, I,
-
I appreciate the length of service that
you've had in the chief's position.
-
Certainly the concept of an interim
chief here in Wellesley was not where we
-
started at the beginning
of this search process,
-
but I think working closely with mri, it,
-
it grew out of the interviews and
the process that was underway and
-
appears to be a good opportunity for
us in terms of trying to understand
-
and define and correct some of the
issues that we perceive to be ongoing in
-
the department. As a result,
-
we anticipate an ongoing relationship
with M R I that is really important
-
to us in terms of a defined period
of one year that we're trying to
-
make this work and achieve
very specific end results.
-
So how would you work with the M R I
team to determine progress on goals
-
and objectives and support
officer development
-
so that we arrive at the end of this
with the ability to go back and search
-
for a permanent chief?
-
my philosophy on the second part of your
question is that basically everybody
-
should know everybody else's
job in the fire service. The,
-
the firefighters should, they should be
trained and they should know what their,
-
their shift commanders do on a daily
basis. They should be mentoring them,
-
and I should be mentoring the
people below me so that, you know,
-
the, that they can get the message
out to the people below that.
-
I do understand that
there are some candidate,
-
you have some internal candidates
that were very close in this process,
-
but weren't quite there yet. And
as I did when I was in Weston,
-
I would work closely with those people
and get them to where they need to be
-
so that they can become a chief or
a deputy wherever they want to go.
-
The MRI team, we could meet this,
we, this was talked about before,
-
that they would lay out, you know,
-
some goals and timelines and we would
meet every couple months to go over
-
whether how the process
was going, how, you know,
-
whether we were getting meeting the goals,
-
whether the person or
people that were in this,
-
these positions were coming up to
speed quick enough or if it was going
-
to take longer, or did they need to
go down and do ano another avenue. I.
-
I think too, as a, as a sort
of a follow up comment and,
-
and question there, there's,
-
there are not just the goals with regard
to internal candidate development,
-
but there are also goals in terms
of sort of cultural change and
-
overall departmental
organization and operation. So I,
-
I think it's very important that you
anticipate working closely with M R I and
-
with Megan
-
in terms of trying to achieve
th that half of the job as well
-
over the next 12 months.
And I, I just want to ask,
-
I assume that you're aware of
that and are need for that to
-
happen as well?
-
Yes. I mean there's, there are,
-
there are issues in every department
that you go to. And we had
-
that pretty much had to change
my first stint as chief,
-
they really weren't a fire department.
It was, it was a fire department,
-
but it was the, you know,
-
just the people that lived in town
and they came and we actually built a,
-
a fire department and I got the buy-in
from the members that were on the
-
department. They worked really
closely with me to do that.
-
When I went to the, when I took on
my second job, there was, you know,
-
there was some internal issues that were
there that had to be addressed as far
-
as getting the department up to The,
-
not this century, but how, how
you need to pass information down.
-
It,
-
it was something that the o
the officers couldn't just hold
-
the information close to their vessel
that no one could take their job.
-
It had to be passed down
to the firefighters so that
they could do the job when
-
the officers were out and they'd be ready
to do the job when the officers were
-
out. I do, I guess I
understand that there was some,
-
there's some schooling, you know,
there's issues with some, you know,
-
going to school and things like that.
-
That's something I would have to evaluate
as to who has what for education.
-
But they all should be at
a, at a level, you know,
-
they should all have their fire officer
officer classes and things like that.
-
So those,
-
those are things that have to work with
that I have to look into and see who
-
has, who has what. I'd have to talk
to Megan and see as far as money,
-
what we have to spend to
send these people to school,
-
whether we need to cover them,
not cover them, things like that.
-
Thank you.
-
Well ahead. Hi,
-
thank you for coming and sharing
your time with us tonight.
-
So I wanted to ask a question, just taking
a deeper dive into your 90 day plan.
-
What are two specific projects that
you would collaborate with the staff to
-
bring positive change to the
Wellesley, the fire department?
-
If you can give us your top
two items, that would be great.
-
I think first I would like to just
go in and meet with all of my,
-
all the senior staff, all the, you know,
the, the deputies and the lieutenants,
-
the union president.
-
I'd like to meet with all of the
groups to get everybody to kind of,
-
to just tell them what my vision is,
what I'm there for, what I'm going to do,
-
get what they are looking to get out
of a fire department because they're,
-
at the end of the day, they're
the ones that they work there,
-
you want to keep them there, you
want them, you want them to be happy.
-
So you've gotta, you've gotta create a
work environment that they want to go to.
-
So I need to know what that is that they,
-
that they are looking for and what they
feel is lacking in, in the department.
-
And then, you know, work on,
-
work on that short term
and then maybe make on,
-
take on a little longer of a
goal period and set that up
-
so that there is, there's,
-
there's goals and objectives set for the
future for the next person who's gonna
-
come in after, after the, the year
for them to follow and finish.
-
And, and it also,
-
it gives the firefighters and the
officers something to strive for.
-
Thank you. And just as a, a follow
up, you did talk a little bit in our,
-
and our last question about is there
enough budget for training and education,
-
things like that.
-
Could you talk to us a little bit
more about your experiencing with Bud,
-
your experience in budgeting
with the department and how,
-
how you work with other
departments in, in doing that?
-
Yeah, I've done budget for 22 years.
-
I've developed basically with, you
know, with the help of the town,
-
with the town manager, the town, the,
-
the treasurer and the accountant. We
would develop a budget. I would base,
-
you know, my budget,
-
there's a lot of variables in this job
that you don't know about. You know,
-
you can't predict how many
buyers you're gonna have.
-
We had callback on our department,
so members would come back.
-
So I can't, you can't predict that.
-
So I had to go in and go back over and
try to get, you know, a pretty good,
-
a pretty good idea of how many times
during the la over the last five years
-
before I came, did this happen,
what they were spending on training,
-
who was getting the training. I looked
at what needed to be done for training,
-
broke it down into smaller, manageable
pieces so I wasn't, you know,
-
throwing everything at
the town at one time,
-
but trying to accomplish the same thing.
-
See what we could do in-house as opposed
to having to go out and either hire
-
someone or bring someone
from the outside in.
-
We looked at, we set up,
-
we had a 10 year capital
replacement plan set with the town
-
as far as, you know, all, all
our pieces, our fire apparatus,
-
our turnout gear was replaced every five
years so that they had a set every so
-
that every 10 years when it,
it goes through its cycle,
-
it can be disposed of properly.
We set up a plan for our,
-
the jaws of white, basically all large
capital expend expenditures. We had,
-
we had figured out for the
future as to what was what,
-
when we were gonna need to replace
them, how much it was gonna be.
-
And we tried to spread things out so it
wasn't all happening at the same time.
-
Okay, thank you. I really appreciate that.
-
Yep, go ahead Megan. You're
gonna go ahead. Yes. Yep.
-
So thanks David. Good to see you
again. Good to see you. And you,
-
you touched on this a little bit already,
-
but could you maybe go through a
few examples of things that you,
-
you've done in the past successfully
or things that you potentially would
-
implement here in,
-
in the interim position for
internal mentorship and you know,
-
how you would make that a success?
-
Yeah, it's, it would start obviously
with me and you have to get
-
the, you know, the officers that
are, that are directly below you,
-
you would need to work with them to make
sure that the message that I'm sending
-
out gets sent down to them.
-
The training that we're doing gets
sent down to them because as I,
-
as I said before, they,
-
everybody there should know what
everybody else's job is. And yeah,
-
you, you do need to go to school
to, you know, to, to advance.
-
But you should have a pretty
good idea of how and what I do.
-
The firefighters should know what the
deputies do and that starts with me and
-
getting out and talking to everybody and
setting them up for the future and say,
-
look, if you want to have a future
here and you want to succeed,
-
this is what you have to do. You have
to do steps A, B, C, and D to do that.
-
I know, I'd have to look at, you know,
-
there's some people probably that are
getting ready for retirement that may not,
-
they may not, you know, need
as much, not need, but they,
-
but the schooling piece of it,
-
it might be a little bit later
in their career for that.
-
So I'd have to find where,
you know, who needs what and,
-
and explain and work with them
as to why they, why they need it.
-
And set up a plan. And you know, this is,
-
you need your associates degree for this,
-
you need to have a bachelor's if you
want to go on to try to be a deputy chief
-
or a chief and, and make all and, and
make all those things available to them.
-
Not, you know, not bringing the
college to them, but, you know,
-
giving them the opportunity to go to
the schools, to go to the fire academy,
-
to go to the National Fire
Academy and things like that.
-
Great, thank you. As Interim
chief, even though it's,
-
it's for one year and, you know,
-
how do you communicate with the residents
and become involved in the community?
-
And, and so that could be, I'll say,
think about it sort of two ways.
-
What have you done in the
past and then, you know,
-
what are some strategies you could do.
-
This upcoming year?
-
I think we tried to be very
big in the community, you know,
-
have a big presence in the
community because people,
-
they don't see you and if they don't see
you, they don't know what you do there.
-
So any town event that we could be at,
-
somebody from the fire department was
there, whether we ho we had an open house,
-
which was a huge success.
-
Every year we ran an open house and people
would come and they'd get to see the
-
trucks. They did ice an ice cream, social.
-
And I would actually go out and scoop
ice cream and my deputy would go out and
-
we would, you know, we
would do that. And any,
-
we were involved with the COA heavily,
I'd meet with them on a monthly basis.
-
We would go over, you know,
-
the people in the town that
were in need in a crisis.
-
And then I had a group of firefighters
who actually went down and they,
-
they taught classes for the coa. They
taught cpr, they taught them fire safety.
-
We were in the,
-
the schools working with them real as
close as we could be with them. You know,
-
they're, they're,
-
it's harder with the schools because
they're so mandated on time and what they
-
can do. But we worked
around it and when, but I,
-
I think any opportunity that you can
put yourself out there in front of the
-
people in the process, they
can put a face, face and a,
-
and a name to what you do, see
what you do, ask you questions,
-
find out what exactly the life of
a firefighter or a fire chief is.
-
It's only positive for the, for the,
both the department and for the town.
-
Great. Thank you Brian.
-
Thank you Dave. What,
-
what are three principles that
would guide you as interim chief and
-
Wellesley both looking at your
career and life experience,
-
and then why do these stand out?
-
I would say honesty, integrity,
-
and consistency. And there are
three things. If you're not,
-
if you're not honest and
transparent with your people,
-
you're never going to
get buy-in from them.
-
If you're not consistent with your people,
-
you're never gonna get buy-in and
integrity and honesty I guess go together.
-
But they, they're gonna look at me as,
-
as their leader as to what I do. And
that's the cue that they're gonna take.
-
And that's how they're gonna,
that's how they're gonna act.
-
If I come into work and
I'm dressed, you know, I,
-
my shoes are untied and I'm like, or
anything like that, and they, if they,
-
they see things like that,
they think it's okay to do,
-
that's what they're gonna
do. So I need to start,
-
I need to set the example of what I want
them to do and how I want them to act.
-
And the only way I'm gonna do
that is to have their trust.
-
Okay, thank you. And sort of the
next question of the couple of parts.
-
First of all,
-
how do you approach diversity and
recruitment of new firefighters
-
considering the current labor.
-
Market? It's, it's a
challenge for everybody.
-
Diversity we had, at one point we had
three females firefighters working.
-
One is a lieutenant one, one had to
leave cuz she was a medic and we aren't,
-
we aren't medic. So she
left for that. It, it,
-
it's really hard. But I, we,
-
I was more fortunate I think where I was
than it is in Wellesley because we had
-
a small call department.
So through word of mouth,
-
through the younger me, through
members on the department,
-
they would get people in there.
-
I had people that worked for the me
for the fire academy. So there just,
-
we had a big network. So we, we gotten
a lot of people that applied. We,
-
we made sure that their dedication,
-
that we made them go
through firefighter one,
-
two before we actually appointed them.
-
And if they were dedicated enough
to spend the four months to do that,
-
then that showed me that
they have that, that they,
-
that they've got a desire to be there.
-
And then we would bring 'em in and
they would do ride time with us.
-
So we got to see them, see whether
they were a fit in the station.
-
Cause both you and I know 75 to
80% of the time is you're in the
-
fire station and you can teach
someone to be a fire firefighter,
-
but you cannot teach them to be a person.
-
And if they don't get along
and work well with others,
-
then it, it's gonna be, it's
not gonna be a good match. So,
-
so I, I was very fortunate in that. And
I know Wellesley runs their own exam,
-
so I would have to dive into the exam and
get into people's backgrounds a little
-
bit and see who's done
what, you know, who, who's,
-
who's kind of stood out,
who's taken that step,
-
who's gone out and got their emt,
-
who's looked or tried to get in some
places to get on a department where they
-
could get sponsored for
firefighter one, two,
-
because that's just another notch in
your belt to get hired. To get hired in,
-
in the department.
-
Okay, thank you. And sort of a
follow up to that, Wellesley,
-
as most departments has
a lot of younger members,
-
sort of, these folks need
to be brought forward.
-
How do you prepare these folks for the
change that's really inevitable in the
-
American fire service?
-
Try to explain, you know, talk
to and explain to them what the,
-
the fire service is, what
it is, what it has evolved.
-
It's not the same job as it was
when you and I first started it.
-
You're not going to fires every day
anymore. I mean, most of our stuff is,
-
is medical related and is,
-
I can't think of the
word, but it's, you know,
-
it's that we're there to help
the, whatever their problem is,
-
we're there to help them. If, if
they call the fire department,
-
the people in the town of Wellsley,
it may not be an emergency to us,
-
but it is to them. So everything, so
everybody gets treated with respect.
-
Everyone gets treated the same way.
-
And so that needs to be explained to
the fire, to the young firefighters,
-
what they're actually
getting themselves into,
-
what the future is going
to be of the fire service.
-
And it needs to start with
the officers on the way down.
-
When I first started it was completely
different. The junior firefighter,
-
you got the coffee, you
cleaned the bathrooms, you
did this, you did, you know,
-
all these things. It's a
different environment today.
-
And these things have to be, you
have, they have to be spread out.
-
The junior firefighter can't be dumped
everything on because they're gonna
-
leave.
-
They're gonna feel like they're being
that it's just not gonna be fun for them
-
and they're gonna want to go someplace
that isn't, that is fun. So you have to,
-
you have to change,
-
basically you have to change the culture
of a fire department and get them to
-
understand that this is,
this is how things are today.
-
And you need to treat these people with
the respect you need to guide them,
-
you need to show them the way you need
to show them what they need to do.
-
There are very few fires today, so any
kind of experience that you can get, any,
-
you know,
-
from a senior member who's been there
and can talk about it with these young
-
people and get them to
understand, you know, what,
-
what they need to do on calls, what they
need to do on certain medical calls.
-
Anything that you can do to
get them to want to come to
-
work is, is, and I'm not saying
anything. I mean there's,
-
there's obviously there's money, there's,
there's a whole lot of different,
-
I had people leaving, you
know, for medic, you know,
-
to go to Cambridge for
money and things like that.
-
But our turnover rate was pretty good
because we made it a really good place for
-
people to want to come
to work. And that's what,
-
that's what I strive for.
-
Okay. So for the last question,
-
I'll turn it over to Megan
and then we'll close out.
-
So the last question is, although
you'll be the interim chief for a year,
-
how would you collaborate with the
wealthy departments or during your
-
tenure? Tenure and set an example
of relationships in the future?
-
With the town departments or.
-
Yeah, with the town departments.
-
We tried very, we,
-
we had really good relationship with the
town departments in the town I was in
-
because you know, the police department,
basically our jobs are the same.
-
I mean, we, we have a hose,
they have a gun, but we're,
-
we're there for the same thing. We're,
-
we're there to take care of whatever
needs that the people have within the
-
towns. 90% of the calls that the police
go on or we go on, we're together.
-
So you have to get along
with them. And we used to at,
-
we used to have the, you know, the
police come up and they'd have dinner,
-
with the members in the station just
because the more that you know about them,
-
the more that they know
about you and what you do,
-
the better off you're gonna
be. Our D P W department,
-
we relied on them for
everything in the wintertime,
-
the roads to make sure
that, you know, they,
-
everything was open that we could
get to where we, we had to get to.
-
They were really good as far as if we
needed some, Hey, we're going here,
-
can you have, you know,
-
the truck that was doing that particular
part of town would make sure that we
-
could get there if ahy, they
took care of the hydrants.
-
So we worked with them in the wintertime.
-
We went out and shoveled the hydrants
and they would go out with their machine
-
and we worked together
to make sure that they,
-
they all get cleared within
a timely manner. We would,
-
we're on the M W R A, which you
are as well. So you have to,
-
at the end of the year, turn in how much
water you use and what you used it for.
-
So if we,
-
we had a spot up in one of the cemeteries
that was just kind of off in the back.
-
It had a hydrant, it was a
great place for us to train.
-
We always let them know so that,
-
so obviously if there was
something going on in the cemetery,
-
we weren't gonna interrupt them.
They know that we were up there.
-
They know that we're using the
water and we could keep track of it.
-
So it made his life a lot easier at the
end of the year as to where that went.
-
Schools, you know, we worked
with them as far as, you know,
-
on the Asher training
and things like that.
-
And we tried to work around
them as much with fire safety,
-
especially on the younger kids. You know,
the older kids, it's a little harder.
-
But you know, we, we worked
with, so the relationship,
-
we're all there for the same thing. We're
all there for the people in Wellesley.
-
At the end of the day, it, that's what,
-
we're there for it for different reasons,
-
but we all have to work together
to make sure that that works.
-
And as far as departments go,
-
I mean I have a really good relationship
with Metro Fire through all the chiefs.
-
I've known them for the last 14 years.
-
We built some really good running
assignments with the cities.
-
We're very fortunate that Wal Dam and
Newton are right there. Cuz Weston is,
-
Weston was small. If we had a
fire, you know, we were running,
-
we had six, sometimes seven
guys go into it. We'd have to,
-
we'd rely heavily on them and at
the end, by the time, you know,
-
they would send and do anything
that we needed him to do.
-
They'd send us whatever we needed.
-
Newton was the same way I could pick
up the phone and call the Boston
-
commissioner cuz I'm, I added something
that I did not know about. And,
-
and he, you know, he'd answer
the question. So there's,
-
I I have a lot of those relationships
already built outside of the department.
-
I'd have to work, you know,
-
obviously in and meet with all the
department heads and see what their
-
expectations of us are and what
I'd be looking for outta them.
-
But I never have had a problem
with any department head.
-
I think if you went back and if
you asked my former employees,
-
I think you'd find the same thing from
them that I was pretty easy to work with.
-
And I got along with pretty
much everybody in the town, so.
-
Great, thank you.
-
Hope that, I hope that
answered your question.
-
It does, thank you.
-
And Dave, just to be
consistent as we close out,
-
talk to the board about your
timeline and availability.
-
The only I have, I mean,
-
the only thing I have is two days coming
up in two weeks that I'm going up to
-
Winni Psaki. Other than
that, I'm, you know, I,
-
I have like some, you know,
-
follow up doctor appointments
on my shoulder and things,
but other than that, I,
-
I can start whenever.
-
Okay, sounds good.
-
So what we'll do is Dave Houghton
or I will follow up with you
-
following this interview and I think
that concludes it for the board
-
tonight. So you can go ahead and
log off and we'll be in touch.
-
All right, well thank you very much.
Thank you everybody for your time.
-
Thank you very much for coming.
-
Okay,
-
so we are moving on to a discussion of
-
the candidates and hopefully a vote.
-
I I will just say, I,
-
I think these are two really strong
candidates and Brian and Megan and
-
Chief,
-
I really appreciate all the work that
you did to bring them to us because I,
-
this is a, a tough choice.
-
We've got two really obviously
very capable and experienced
-
people who,
-
who had a lot of great
answers to our questions.
-
So I'll just maybe ask if Brian,
-
you wanna say anything or Jack,
-
Megan and then open up to
comments from the board.
-
So it was our goal to give
the board a choice of two
-
individuals that could do the job. I I
think they both have different strengths.
-
You have Todd as someone
that hasn't been a chief as
-
long,
-
but certainly has some very different
labor route and comes from sort of a
-
larger organization.
-
A and then you have Chief Soar
who is a well established,
-
well-respected Massachusetts
chief who offers a lot in a sort
-
of a different way. So I think
from Dave Houghton and myself,
-
they're both very capable.
-
We really look at it as it's a
question of fit with the board
-
and on a daily basis fit with
Megan and the the chief. And,
-
and I really think that they
need to weigh in on that fit set.
-
I mean, I'm happy to weigh in
that we, I'll speak for myself.
-
I thought we could definitely work with
either candidate. I thought they both
-
were just as, as candid and
-
terrific in their responses with the
chief and I as they were tonight publicly.
-
I think they, we couldn't have
asked for better candidates.
-
We totally lucked out
that they're, you know,
-
willing to come back for a stint
of service after many years of
-
fire service. So I I I don't
necessarily have a preference.
-
I am very comfortable
with either candidate.
-
I think either one would be
serve the town very well that
-
I think in, they've both been very
collaborative in speaking to other
-
folks regarding them. It,
-
so we've had very positive reviews. Jack,
I don't know if you wanna add to that.
-
No, I, I, I concur with you, me, Megan.
-
I think the board has a tough decision
because I think they're both very
-
qualified. They're both,
-
they're different and I
think their approaches might
be a little bit different,
-
but at the end of the day, I, I think
either one could get the job done and,
-
and I could work with either one.
-
So I, I guess I'll just open with my,
-
my inclination and
-
grateful to hear from
others about their thoughts.
-
But I do think I given
-
the, as as Brian put it, the,
-
the distinctions between
the two candidates.
-
I do wonder if a fresh,
-
the fresh approach that the
candidate from New Hampshire brings.
-
It would be a really useful, I mean we're,
-
we're gonna be undergoing
a transition here.
-
And I think my sense,
my, I don't know, my,
-
I guess just gut instinct was
that he would bring a lot of fresh
-
ideas and I think one of the things
that we could really benefit from is,
-
is a lot of experience with a
different way of doing things.
-
Not that we necessarily
wanna do it that way,
-
but that that person would
bring kind of a different,
-
a different take.
-
And I think Chief Soar would also,
-
obviously has worked in a number
of different departments, but I,
-
I'm guessing his experience has
been by his own description,
-
has been much closer to
the Wellesley experience.
-
And I feel like what we
could really use right now is
-
some more out of the box thinking.
-
Not that Chief Sawer wouldn't
be capable of doing that,
-
but just by, by
-
just from having worked in a different
state and a different environment,
-
there might be some really fresh ideas
that that would be useful for our
-
department to have and could really help
-
create a a, a whole new
culture. So I I that's,
-
I'm sort of stumbling around here
because it really is a very tough
-
call, but I i, that,
-
that's sort of what
where my gut landed me.
-
Anyone else?
-
Beth?
-
So I agree that both are
very interesting candidates,
-
so thank you Brian and your
group. I think I netted out,
-
not surprisingly, probably
in a different place.
-
So I look at our most important job as
-
providing service to the community.
-
And I think Mr.
-
Soar is more familiar with
our type of community.
-
And what struck me is
his confidence that yes,
-
he's a collaborative leader, but at
the end of the day he makes decisions,
-
he gets buy-in and he
leads the department at all
-
levels through those choices
and he holds the line.
-
And I think that is, for me,
very important in a chief.
-
I want someone who, at the end of the day,
-
the buck stops with them and they're
going to own the decisions and they're not
-
afraid of change.
-
So it sounded to me like
he has been on our journey
-
of stepping into a department where
the leadership isn't quite there
-
yet,
-
but that there was a pathway
to get the members trained
-
and give them the experience
and that exposure.
-
And so for me that that
-
experience doing that was
very, very compelling.
-
And on the flip side,
-
I think there's too
many differences for me,
-
although I, I was very
impressed by Mr. Jermaine.
-
He's from a different state,
-
he's from a city and
he's a relatively young
-
y not young age wise, but less,
-
less exposed to all the challenges
that being a chief and holding
-
the line have because he
just did it for less time.
-
And I feel like what we should be
bringing to the community is that
-
absolute surety that
-
the chief has the
experience to lead through
-
decisions and lead
through change. And so I,
-
I feel more inclined toward Mr.
-
Soer because I feel like he
comes with that full package of
-
what we need.
-
Tom.
-
You know, I,
-
it was interesting to hear
both of your comments just now,
-
Lisa, I agree with a lot of what you said,
-
but what I found myself wondering
is whether you were describing
-
a year from now the new chief
-
and whether what we need over the
next year is to right the ship
-
and to get the essential
department organized and
-
squared away in a way that
it is receptive and capable
-
of moving forward with new ideas
and outta the box thinking.
-
And that led me to think that,
-
that David might be a better
fit because the sheer command
-
presence, I, I think that's one of
the big advantages that he had to me
-
he understood how he needed to arrive
at a decision that was right for a
-
particular situation, but I think
he has a command presence that,
-
that Todd doesn't lack but
didn't have to the same
-
degree simply because of the number
of years that they've been chief.
-
And I I,
-
I wonder if the number of
years in services a chief I,
-
I'm thinking that that does
matter in this situation.
-
And, and I'm, I'm also think wondering
and, and this may be something
-
that Brian would be able to comment on if,
-
if there's a benefit to someone
who's well known and respected
-
within our fire community here,
-
because inevitably what you see
is the union and the individual
-
firefighters have connections
within that network and can go back
-
out and say, should I listen to this
guy or not? Is this guy a good guy?
-
Is he somebody who's got
the ability to do this job?
-
And they're gonna get
that kind of feedback.
-
As I went through the interview with,
-
as we went through the
interview with Todd,
-
and I mean this as a compliment to him,
-
I wondered whether he really wants
to be through with active duty
-
or whether he might end
up looking for a return
-
perhaps in another state.
-
I'm not at all familiar with the
New Hampshire retirement laws,
-
but the feeling I had is that he's
not through with with that job.
-
And I think David is through
with being an active chief,
-
but would bring a presence,
-
a basis of knowledge
and a and a skillset to
-
the work as interim chief. That
that's what attracted me to him.
-
And Mar right,
-
I wanna jump in before Colette so
that Colette ends up having to be the
-
tiebreaker here. No, cause I,
-
I actually agree with
everything everyone said.
-
I I thought they were both
great but both different.
-
I guess what I'm,
-
I'm struggling with is what do we
need for an interim versus the next
-
chief? And
-
I did see feel that,
-
that David would,
-
would be a steady hand and bring so much
-
to the community while he's here and,
-
and if that's what we're looking
for is the steady hand to,
-
to just see us through the next
year, I think he'd be amazing.
-
And then I thought that
the other candidate,
-
I felt like he would come in and be,
-
would see things differently, which
is what you were saying, Lisa.
-
And it is a different way of
looking at it and it'd be different.
-
And if that's what we're
looking for in the interim,
-
he's the one to bring that
difference, I think. And so I,
-
I see them both doing
something great for Wellesley.
-
It's really what, what
do we want in this year?
-
And I think one thing
that really struck me
-
about about,
-
sorry about God, right? Yes.
So I lose my names, is that
-
he definitely saw that his main role was
the mentorship and I really heard that
-
in what he said.
-
And so I saw him seeing this as a job.
-
He was gonna come in and
help and help bring the,
-
the next generation along and get us
really ready for a new transition a year
-
from now, which I really appreciated.
-
I'm certain that David
could do that as well.
-
So I I really think that
they're both great and it's,
-
I guess I would slightly
lean towards Todd,
-
but I could be convinced the other way.
-
I do think they're both great
and it's just different.
-
It's, are we looking for a
shift or a steadying is what,
-
how I see this.
-
Oh boy. So I did,
-
this is a really, really difficult choice.
-
This is probably one of the most difficult
candidate selection processes I've
-
ever been through because
these are two amazing choices.
-
You're being asked to choose almost it
feels like between two good friends or
-
you know, someone, both people
that would be amazing for the job.
-
So that's, that's on the,
on the plus side for us.
-
I think we're gonna commit to
this in a very, very good place.
-
When I started on paper and I I,
I read all We have, I was really,
-
the,
-
the depth and breadth of the chief
experience was really important to me.
-
So I really was predisposed to Mr.
-
Sore when I read on paper.
-
And then of course the interviews they
both interviewed amazingly and I was
-
actually really struck by,
-
although they're different
people in different approaches,
-
they gave a lot of very similar responses.
-
They understand exactly what it is
we need to do, where we need to go,
-
what the steps are to get there. So I
think we're gonna have the same approach.
-
I'm so torn on this one because I
completely agree with everything everyone
-
said. One thing that kind of
speaks to me a little bit is
-
both our internal candidates
and our new firefighters
-
are young.
-
And so having someone closer
to them might in their
-
sort of arc of life would, might,
might help with the mentorship process.
-
Whereas the, the gravity,
the command presence,
-
the this sort of agent experience that
David brings is unquestionably there and
-
is is very distinctive and
very comforting for us.
-
We would know we'd be, we'd
be in a very steady hand.
-
It's hard because he also brings a
knowledge of the area and the culture
-
and the, the neighboring towns and the
people he'd been working with. But I,
-
I do think I lean towards
Mr. Soar in the end.
-
I would be happy to go with either,
but I think that's where I'm leaning
-
just from a perspective of a little
bit of an outside perspective
-
because we are,
-
we are seeking that as part of the
mentorship for not only the leadership,
-
but it will also help with the
younger generation. So that's,
-
that's where I'm leaning.
Did you Mr. Jermaine,
-
sorry, Mr. Jermaine. Sorry,
-
did I under duress in the moment probably
said the wrong word, but Mr. Jermaine,
-
I think, yeah, that's what I'm waiting.
-
Yeah, I i it's, it's hard not to,
-
for every argument for one, there's
a counter argument for the other.
-
It's hard not to, not
to be doing that in in,
-
at least I'm finding that in my
head. But I, I will just say I think,
-
I do think to your point Ann Mara,
-
about sort of what is the
goal here for this year. I,
-
I think it's more than a steady
hand I would say. I mean I,
-
I think we do have some
changes that that need to
-
happen and,
-
and this mentorship is
obviously a major goal.
-
So I I would, that's,
-
that's sort of what the way I'm thinking
about what's going to happen over the
-
course of this year. I'm sorry
Tom, did you have your hand up?
-
Well, I, I did because it, it,
-
I think it's important that people,
-
that there have been several people
who have used the term steady hand and
-
I, I'm, I'm trying to sort of share
my thinking so that people can,
-
can not just tell me whether they
disagree, but help me sort of refine it.
-
And to me there's an attraction to
a steady hand in terms of what I
-
think has to happen over the next
year in that I don't think we
-
have a problem fighting fires. I I,
-
my understanding is that our
personnel are very good in the job
-
of fighting fires. And
so I wonder if that,
-
if that steady hand, if
it's in the right person,
-
means that there is a consistency within
which they are able to identify the
-
kinds of problems we have and fix
them and that that's where the command
-
presence comes from. I'm,
-
I'm a bit concerned that
Todd as a person who
-
is younger but who has
less command experience
-
won't have that same
advantage. And I'm not sure,
-
while he has some different thinking
that he has a basis of knowledge with
-
which to move forward in effective
ways with that new thinking,
-
I, I think that's,
that's an advantage too.
-
So my comments would be very different
if we were interviewing these two as
-
a permanent chief, but I
just wonder if over the,
-
over the next year there isn't
a benefit to that significant
-
experience that David brings to the table.
-
Beth? So yeah,
-
and thank you first for to everyone for
their comments cuz I do think this is
-
both very important and also
a very difficult choice.
-
I think the other reason
I am inclined toward Mr.
-
Soar is that a year is not a lot of time.
-
And when I think about the,
-
the number of things that
when you take on a new role,
-
learning the community
learning, the state learning,
-
the department and mentoring
seemed to me to be,
-
if we can knock a few o off,
-
we're giving our interim a higher amount
-
of time to focus on the things that
-
set us up long term. So
if the community is known,
-
the network in the state is known,
-
the the kind of the area is understood,
-
then for me it allows more,
-
more opportunity to focus on the
department as opposed to focus
-
on everything else.
-
That is it doing all the
other parts of being a
-
chief will take less, less time.
-
So that's part of what I looked at
in terms of prioritizing because
-
if we're bringing someone in that maybe
doesn't have all those boxes checked,
-
but they're here for a longer time,
I think that's a different choice.
-
But we're looking for
a year. And so for me,
-
I, I would like
-
some of the skillsets or some
of the inherent knowledge
-
to be in place when the
person starts. And I,
-
Brian maybe can comment on that, but that,
-
that's one of the things in addition to
what Tom so eloquently put as command
-
presence I think was also
going on in my choice. Set.
-
Any other comments?
-
Yeah, I just, I just wanted to
sort of, I I, I completely, I hear,
-
you know, both Tom and
Beth's comments here,
-
but I,
-
but I just want to note that the
department itself knows the community,
-
knows the town, knows the
networks. We have that.
-
And so I'm just trying to
balance between, you know,
-
what we have and what we're looking to
add to this department in the next 12
-
months.
-
Yeah, I think that's a really
good point. I I think that's,
-
that's well said. I, I feel like
those are the things that we have,
-
we have a strong department
that can, you know,
-
preserve safety and, and do its
job very effectively in the town.
-
I'm thinking more in terms of what
we don't have and that we need. And
-
to me that's sort of
the fresh approach and
-
a perspective from other departments and,
-
and how they do things differently
in other places that could really
-
help us leap ahead over
the course of this year
-
in terms of becoming a more
state-of-the-art department,
-
which is kind of where I
would like to see us go.
-
So that's what's persuasive to me about
-
sort of the outside candidate
-
and Mara.
-
so now everything everyone says I
agree with and it shifts my perspective
-
and then I shift back. So
-
I completely agree with Colette saying
that we have so much already in our
-
department,
-
but that also made me think about
the fact that this person's gonna
-
walk in and not have a lot
of time to get things done.
-
And so I'm thinking about who is
going to be trusted more quickly
-
and maybe they're familiar
-
would have a better impact or a more
chance for an impact in this one year
-
because
-
he would walk in and already
just because of the familiarity
-
Weston is right next door
-
and that command presence and
his years of experience that he
-
would,
-
he would walk in maybe having that
respect without having to do much.
-
He just is right. Whereas, you know,
-
the other candidate might have to work
harder to earn that respect and that time
-
that it would take in that department
to get that is time that might get
-
wasted in this very short year. So
I'm, now I'm shifting because I i
-
I really think that it is important to
get as much done as possible in this,
-
in that short period of time. And I
mean obviously we're not, it isn't,
-
we haven't said it's calendar year,
you know, August 12th to August 12th,
-
but there is something to be said
about a person that could walk in and
-
immediately
-
just walk into being the Wellesley fire
chief even on an interim basis without
-
really any concerns whatsoever, I don't
think from anyone in the department.
-
But, you know, I wish I, I'm not that
I've talked to anybody in the department,
-
but now I'm starting to think that way.
-
Jack.
-
Can we ask, I, I don't know
how much Brian can add to this,
-
but I'm interested in his perspective.
-
So again, I think,
-
I feel the board's pain here that
this is a very difficult decision.
-
We strobe to give you a tough choice and,
-
and I think between Dave
and I that have done this,
-
we see some of the same advantages and
disadvantages that you have pointed out,
-
whether it's familiarity with metro
fire in the network. Ultimately
-
we're trying to give the department
an opportunity to grow and,
-
and to sort of grow toward
where the fire service is
-
going in the future. Either
one is capable of doing that.
-
I really balance the
outside perspective benefit
-
with being an established
mass chief as about equal.
-
So chief I'm gonna sort of defer to,
-
it's really the board's
difficult decision.
-
Either one of them could do a great job
and, and that's how we vetted them. And,
-
and to be honest with you,
-
Dave and I had some of the same
discussions that you're having,
-
which one would be better? And
I think we also had it with the,
-
the chief and Megan as well.
-
So I know I'm not adding
a lens of clarity here,
-
but I I think either one is fine for
what you're trying to accomplish.
-
They may do it in a different way,
but I think the, the department,
-
as long as the,
-
the department embraces the
interim chief and the opportunity
-
to grow has a real springboard forward
here and it can be very positive
-
as long as it's looked at in that way.
-
Okay.
-
Well I I'm not sure.
-
I'm not sure any, I I, does anyone have
anything they, they really wanna add?
-
Are we ready to, are people
pretty much talked out?
-
Ann Mara, you look like you're sort
of on the verge of saying something.
-
I just, I just wanna
clarify, did, did everybody,
-
so I I did think their leadership
styles were, were very different,
-
right? And I just wanna make sure
that I was seeing that properly that,
-
that Mr. Jermaine is a,
is a little bit more of a,
-
he used the word Democratic, right?
So it's, I might say collaborative,
-
although he didn't use that.
-
He said Democratic where I
really felt like Chief Soar is
-
very much, he, he is the chief.
-
So it's a little more of a
top-down approach and I told him,
-
is that what everybody else picked
up? Cuz it's Yes. Misunderstand that.
-
Yeah, Collin and did you pick up
that as well? Yeah, yeah. I mean the,
-
I those were the notes I took. Yeah.
-
I think that's an excellent point. Ammar,
-
you, you're looking at Todd,
-
Mr. Jermaine, chief Jermaine as
-
maybe his approach and is more
-
win over people over the course of time
-
as opposed to Chief Soar who
-
would come in and
-
through his presence
-
kind of lead direct, you know, right away.
-
I, I I think there's an
advantage of someone who's not,
-
not, not that they're not
concerned, but somebody who
-
is more
-
willing to do it their way instead of you,
-
you can collaborate to a certain extent.
-
I'm not sure how much this department,
-
the fire department needs
that collaboration. I think
both will collaborate,
-
but there's something to be said for
somebody to come in and say, Hey look,
-
this is the way it's gonna be and you
don't like it, talk to me about it.
-
But at the end of the day, that's what
it's gonna be. Not here to make friends.
-
I I'm I'm here to, you
know, get the job done. I
-
they're both great
candidates. I like 'em both.
-
Okay, well, so we lost Dan Mara.
-
I mean I I I really feel that too,
that they're both great candidates.
-
I hear a very strong
argument for Chief Sar.
-
I'd be very comfortable with
him as, as our selection
-
and I'm happy to go with that.
-
As would I, Lisa, like
I said at the beginning,
-
we are in great hands with either of
these choices or just absolutely they're
-
just different and I'm, I'm,
-
I'm very comfortable with either choice
and either choice would have my full
-
support.
-
Okay. Would.
-
You like a motion, Lisa?
-
Well, I'm, I'm feel a little Ann Mara
is on the phone. I just wanna make sure.
-
I'm, I'm so sorry that was like a little
family emergency, but I'm, I'm back.
-
I apologize for that.
-
I was just saying that both Colette
and I were just saying we'd be very
-
comfortable with the selection
of Chief Soar. So, you know,
-
I I think we're we're, we've
reached a consensus here.
-
Yeah, I mean that's
where we're netting out.
-
I I think they're both great so I would
completely support the board if that's
-
the direction.
-
Okay. So yes, I think we need a motion.
-
Okay. Move to appoint Mr.
-
David Soar as interim fire chief and
Wellsey subject to a successful contract
-
negotiation.
-
And do we put a time start or.
-
I think it would be contingent upon
the contract and their availability.
-
Okay, great.
-
Second.
-
Aye and Beth.
-
Aye.
-
Tom Aye and I vote Aye as well.
-
Okay. That was a tough one, but Brian,
-
thank you very much. It was a,
-
a really fascinating conversation
with both candidates and I
-
know we're, we're gonna
be in very good hands.
-
Okay. And we'll follow up and inform both
candidates and take it from there with
-
Megan. So thank you very much for tonight.
-
Thank you. Thank.
-
Lisa. I apologize but I just have to
step out for two more minutes so I,
-
I know you'll move on,
but I'll be right back.
-
Okay. All right.
-
So next item is discuss and
vote the PSI recommendation with
-
regard to the Wellesley College
Health and Counseling Center.
-
So thank you.
-
We have Michelle Mahu from Wellesley
College here along with Justin Mosca,
-
who is the V H B engineer on the project.
-
Good to see you again Justin. He, he's
done some ful work over the years,
-
so the project has been submitted
for a project of significant impact.
-
I can have Justin give you a brief
overview of the project, but, or Michelle,
-
but just as a reminder,
-
so the select board's role in
this is the select board issues,
-
a recommendation to the
permit granting authority,
-
the planning board with
regards to traffic,
-
both signalize and unsign
lines intersections,
-
as well as sidewalk evaluations
as part of the pedestrian bike and
-
safety evaluations.
-
So the board has received
the application. I had a,
-
initially a draft
recommendation I have sent
-
given this project largely
does not trigger many of the
-
components of the PSI
traffic because it's a,
-
it's actually a reduction
in square footage and we,
-
we can go through that briefly. I
did have beta engineering just do a,
-
a brief peer review on this and the,
-
the board didn't really see
it cuz it, but it was tan,
-
got back to me just through
an email that, you know, they,
-
they had no issues with
traffic, no issues with parking,
-
construction, traffic. They had
a few questions on Sidewalk,
-
which we can address as part of the
discussion. And, and so with that,
-
maybe Justin I'll just have you
give, you know, a or Michelle,
-
whoever would like to proceed
with just a very brief
-
overview of the project the board has
received the, the full PSI application.
-
Yep. No, certainly I'll, I'll
keep it high level and just,
-
just walk you through and orient.
Let me share my screen real quick.
-
Please comes through.
-
So thank you for having us again.
Just having listened to the last one,
-
I need to just point out that I don't
envy your position on having to make that
-
vote. So hopefully this
one will be easier for you.
-
So we are hopefully most, most folks
are familiar with Wealthy College,
-
Route 1 1 35 Central Street is up on
sort of the top of the map that you're
-
seeing here and Route 16 Washington
Street is kind of on the,
-
on the southeast border, the of
the college with Lake Waban on the,
-
to the Southwest.
-
So everything you see sort of between
that triangle as Wellesley College.
-
The project that we're
proposing is kind of,
-
sort of smacked out in the
middle of, of the property.
-
It's over by the science center and
it's a replacement of Simpson Hall,
-
which is this building right
here. So it's actually gotten a,
-
it's attached to Simpson Cottage with it,
-
which is an older structure and
that Simpson Cottage is staying.
-
But as I zoom back out, so
you can see the campus again,
-
you can kind of see how it's how
it's in the middle of the property.
-
And that's important, you know, we'll
talk about that a little bit later.
-
But just because we're not making any
changes to connections to the municipal
-
infrastructure for
College Road, like where,
-
where you actually access the college,
the project itself, as Megan mentioned,
-
it's a reduction in square footage.
The existing Simpson Hall that,
-
that I had circled is a
19,000 square foot structure.
-
The building that's gonna be going in
is a new health and counseling center,
-
and that is 11,000 square feet.
-
So the health services are current or
were currently, that doesn't make sense.
-
They were in Simpson
Hall previously. They're,
-
they've been temporarily moved to
the college club to make way for this
-
demolition. And then the health services
will move back into this facility.
-
The health services are run by Newton
Wellesley Hospital for the college.
-
So essentially these are programs
and staff and students that are all
-
present in the college already.
-
It's not a growth in at any kind in
student population or staff population.
-
And we're not impacting any parking
spaces. And it will temporarily,
-
they'll need to be laid
downs for construction,
-
but ultimately everything around
the building stays the same.
-
So we're not creating any parking spaces
or removing any parking spaces as part
-
of the project. And we're
not, again, changing any,
-
any connections to the, to
route 16 or to route 1 35.
-
That is probably the
majority of the summary.
-
I think that we can open discussion.
-
I guess the only other thing I'd
mention is we did get comments from the
-
municipal light,
-
municipal light plant fire department
and engineering light plant and fire
-
department had no issue with this.
-
Engineering had a few comments that
they just requested that we provide some
-
supplemental information, which we've
done today. So everyone seems to be,
-
to be on board. So again, no growth
and it's a reduction in square footage,
-
so it's really not a traffic
generating project. So.
-
So the only thing, Lisa, I I just
wanted to clarify on the sidewalk.
-
So typically for P S I,
-
we would look at the adjoining
sidewalks within 600 feet.
-
So obviously with the college
campuses it's a little bit unique.
-
So Justin actually went above and beyond
and really did an evaluation on the
-
exterior of the parcel
of the campus along 1 35,
-
basically circumnavigating
most of the, you know,
-
three quarters of the site looking
at 1 35 along lessen road down to
-
Washington Street. He did an
evaluation of all those sidewalks.
-
The only comments we
potentially could have,
-
and I think this map is
super helpful, Justin,
-
cause it leads exactly to my
comment is that, you know,
-
when in Justin's analysis and in the
review by beta, it was just that,
-
there are a few intersections
that you could focus on as a
-
recommendation to the planning
board to add the ADA ramping
-
to it,
-
which would be largely at
1 35 in the college drive,
-
or potentially at
-
the pedestrian signalization at Washington
-
Street. But given the,
-
the significant area distance to 600 feet,
-
typically we're looking at that within
-
the particular RightWay to the 600
feet immediately adjoining the land.
-
So that it's pretty far
away. W it was the comment,
-
it's certainly something we
could highlight for planning
if the board so chose,
-
but I think it's a little greater
than P s I initially intends
-
because this is the college campus that
has a parcel of significant acreage.
-
So I just wanted to raise that point.
-
And then the only other thing
that we can clarify, Justin,
-
is that part of the
application, and Michelle,
-
we notice some inconsistencies
with regards to the services
provided by the M W
-
R T A.
-
So they have ramped up some of their
services in terms of our access to some
-
public transportation, which
is just an improvement.
-
So that's even above and beyond what
we, we currently have. And so, you know,
-
offline we can maybe set up a meeting
to just educate the college on,
-
on the new services that M W R T A
has as well as the fact that M B T A
-
is now on a clock face schedule
for the commuter rail services. So,
-
so that's just an additional
improvement actually in terms of
-
exterior transportation in
the immediate vicinity. So,
-
you know, happy to answer
questions from the board,
-
but I did just wanna call and
the map is really helpful.
-
So if that's something we wanted
to forward to the recommendation,
-
it would really be looking at
adding and the board's aware of the,
-
the a d a plates that we've had
on actually a large lot of our
-
psis in more recent time because
it's been a change in infrastructure
-
requirement. So as soon
as the road's touched,
-
which we actually don't have
jurisdiction necessarily,
-
we'd need mass co t approval for the,
-
the section on 1 35 1 Route 1 35,
-
which is under Mass cot
jurisdiction or Washington Street.
-
But, you know, so that's
just one potential.
-
If we were gonna put any recommendation
in it would be to add those, I think.
-
And, and let me just, I can tell you the,
-
my apologies, my.
-
Yeah, and those just while you're,
while you're looking that up too,
-
I was doing a takeoff, so like the,
-
from our project to the end
of College road where that
-
meets 1 35 just for, for reference,
it's about 2300 feet away.
-
Yeah. So when you make, when
you mention that 600 foot right,
-
we're only really looking at that
because the property is that big.
-
We're we're really dead, dead set
in the middle of the property.
-
And I think the other one was about 1300
somewhere that range just to route 16.
-
Yeah, it was closer to 1300 feet.
-
Yeah. So I mean the, the
three intersection, if,
-
if we were gonna make a recommendation,
they were looking at Western Road,
-
at Central College Road, at Central
and College Road at Washington,
-
those three particular locations.
But I just note the difference,
-
the distance, excuse me to
Justin's point, it it's,
-
what are those instances too,
where the information was provided?
-
So we were gonna do the review.
-
Hola, did you have a question?
Did, so I, I did notice the,
-
the curb reveals and that comment,
and I did recently take a,
-
a little bit of a walk
in Walsey Square with a
-
a, a young student I've been working
with on mobility who does have mobility
-
impairments and vision
impairments. And, you know,
-
the conversation that I
had with him was at the,
-
the bright markers are really helpful.
So, you know, there, there is a,
-
a need and a use for them. But one
of the things I wanted to ask about,
-
on page three of seven,
-
third paragraph to the bottom,
-
it's talking about Central
Street and College Road.
-
And there it's saying it's observed that
there was a ramp on the eastern side
-
that has a noticeable curb reveal on
the roadway that's not convenient for
-
travel by a wheelchair. Can you explain
that more to me, Megan? What kind of,
-
what are we talking about and what are
the alternatives for someone who is
-
traveling by a wheelchair
in that area or that,
-
that jumped out to me as being different
from the other items that were raised?
-
Sorry, what what street? I'm sorry,
Colette, I might have an image of it.
-
Central Street and College Road.
-
I street side of college road.
-
I have, I have an, I have an
image that I can project If you,
-
if you could stop sharing for one moment,
-
which might just clarify that
-
this is an image that Beta had
just had, oh sorry, is it up?
-
So this is college road at Central.
-
So this is that area where it's
the, the curb comes to grade.
-
Sorry, I'll just see if I can, I can't
really shift it. You can see sort of the,
-
to the northern section as well,
-
rather than having the a d
you know how it tends to be
-
a three square sort of down
with the, with the plate.
-
But I I I think it was saying that
that curb reveal was more troublesome
-
than the other areas that
they were identifying.
-
And so I'm wondering if
that should be elevated.
-
There is certainly,
there's a, a lip there.
-
It looks like I can
steal the screen again.
-
Try again Justin. Sorry. Yep.
-
You can see it in, in street view the,
the lip that's there. So I think there,
-
there were certainly some
deficiencies, you know,
-
a few deficiencies that were noted
in the sidewalk inventory that
-
would be better served being
fixed. I think the, you know,
-
the question is, is it part of
this project and should it be,
-
you know, should it be part of this
project? Cause I don't know, you know,
-
if that's necessarily
related. I think that's up to,
-
I'm assuming that's up to the board
to, to decide. But that's the,
-
that's the image there. You can
kind of see the, the drop off. Yep.
-
Yeah, if I could, if I could just
jump in really quickly. You know,
-
we're super committed to accessibility
on campus. We've done our own,
-
we've been improving accessibility
both in buildings and site pathways and
-
parking lots across campus. So I'm,
-
I'm just really interested and thankful
to hear some of these comments because
-
we have a means to definitely
address some of these things.
-
like I'm not sure this project has to
be the means to get to the ends here.
-
So I'm super interested in
continued conversation and hearing
-
some of this seems like kind of low
hanging fruit and I think it's something
-
that like, I'm surprised I,
-
I would've loved to have addressed
this like before this project. So I'm,
-
I'm super open to it.
I just dunno like that,
-
that this project should be the vehicle
in which we're trying to a approach and,
-
and handle these things. And I'm happy
if that's the way you deem it necessary.
-
But I, I just, I'm like,
-
I'm super interested and I think we have
some ways to address some of these low
-
hanging fruit issues. So it's,
it's helpful feedback. Thank you
-
Tom.
-
I, I honestly, I wanna be sure
I'm not missing something.
-
We have a building in the middle
of a college campus that is
-
going to get smaller for the
same use and it seems to me a
-
greatly disproportionate
conversation here going on about,
-
I I don't, I don't know why
we haven't taken the vote.
-
I I I think that, that
Michelle is, is right.
-
I I think if we just go to the college
and talk to 'em about a few issues like
-
this, that they would be responsive. But
-
to me this is a no-brainer. I, i, I don't,
-
I I wanna make sure I'm
not missing something.
-
So, so that's why I'm calling
it out with the fact that we,
-
Justin did,
-
it's sort of like too
much information and,
-
and the best way possible he went
above and beyond and really did
-
the whole parcel. So, so we looked at it,
-
but that's why I said the map is
actually really helpful. So, I mean,
-
it's something that, again,
-
I totally agree we can work with
the college on in in the future.
-
I was just raising it
because we, we did have it
-
modestly peer review because there's
not a whole lot to look at to the exact
-
point that you, you said Tom,
-
so we did just note a
couple deficiencies that
-
are there that could be a recommendation
if the board wanted to add them.
-
And we are just the
recommendation body and the,
-
and the planning board
would be the ultimate
-
permit grant authority. But I, I
don't disagree with you at all,
-
but I felt it from a transparency
standpoint to raise it.
-
Yeah, I I think it's really useful to
have those things highlighted. I don't,
-
I don't know that we're necessarily
planning, you know, I don't think Tom,
-
that we're, we're delaying a vote.
-
I, I didn't mean to say that
I, I, that was, you know,
-
I was trying to sort of make a point and
I I didn't mean there's always room for
-
discussion, you know, according to
what the Burke board wants to raise.
-
And, and I don't mean to suggest
otherwise, but I, I'm reminded
-
about the discussion about handicapped
curb cuts in the Honeywell school
-
and when I was on the school building
committee and the controversy that rose
-
and the expense that was added
to that project. Well beyond,
-
I think what the scope should
have been for the work.
-
So ag again, i,
-
I certainly don't in any way mean to
suggest any disrespect for the amount of
-
deliberation the board
wishes to put into this, but,
-
but I just think that, that the,
-
the college is demonstrating a
willingness to engage in these kinds of
-
conversations. I think they are important.
-
I think that is a good example of
a curb cut that ought to be fixed.
-
But I don't think we wanna set a precedent
that will attach to a project like
-
this.
-
Beth.
-
So first I think this is a really
exciting project and I'm glad to see the
-
investment in a health center on campus.
-
And I,
-
I think I generally agree with Tom that
it would be nice to improve the curb
-
cuts. I, I don't have a problem
pointing it out to planning, but I,
-
I don't see it as
-
kind of fundamental to
moving this project forward.
-
My question really is
about the 33 parking spaces
-
and is I, I guess I wondered
when the curb cut thing came up.
-
Is that because you're
moving the parking spaces
-
across the street from the campus?
-
the 33 was actually just a combination
of the parking that's out there around
-
the building today.
-
And it was a temporary impact because we
don't know where construction layout's
-
gonna be. We gotta work
with the contractor.
-
Those are temporary spaces that would
be relocated and they'd be absorbed into
-
the, into the college.
-
There's no plan to do anything
outside the limits of the college.
-
And that's just knowing
that the contractor's gonna
need to lay down somewhere.
-
So as soon as the building's
back in the permanent condition,
-
those spaces are right back to what
they are today. But there's actually,
-
there's contractor parking
on the campus. There's,
-
we've done parking studies in the
past and there's usually, you know,
-
a surplus of spaces of somewhere in
around on the range of 10% of the,
-
the parking capacity overall,
which is, well, more than the,
-
the 33 spaces there. So we're not,
we're not anticipating any issue with,
-
with parking.
-
Okay. I,
-
I know one of the things we always hear
is there's no parking for the residents
-
that want to, you know,
-
those few spots that are kind
catches catch can for people who
-
wanna walk the lake. And so I.
-
Yeah, this wouldn't be in that of the
lake would be protected. Yeah. Okay.
-
Super. Thank you so much.
So congratulations on this.
-
Yeah, I, I think we, we
probably ready for a vote I,
-
or for a motion anyway. I,
-
I will just say I do think it's
important to highlight these
-
accessibility issues for the college. I,
-
I personally don't think they need to be
in the form of any kind of requirement,
-
but I, I think, I mean, I'm grateful
to Justin I for raising this. I think,
-
you know, we're,
-
we're all developing greater
sensitivity to accessibility issues and,
-
and I'm sure the college
is way more sensitive than,
-
than anybody else on this issue,
-
knowing that you have a diversity of
students on your campus and are trying to
-
accommodate them. Yeah.
-
Can I just, before you take the vote,
-
just let you know that we've worked
for two years with the Massachusetts
-
Architectural Access Board.
-
We've implemented a memorandum of
understanding with them for an accessible
-
housing plan on our campus.
-
It's an approach to our campus
that provides all the accessibility
-
that you would find, but it spreads
it out throughout the campus,
-
throughout our entire portfolio. So
it was a two year planning effort.
-
It's a 10 year buildup plan that's just
for our residence halls. As I mentioned,
-
we have an entire accessibility
upgrade effort through the campus
-
roadways and parking. So again,
I want you to tell you all,
-
like we're extremely committed to this
and really appreciate and love hearing
-
these areas that could
make big impact, you know,
-
in small ways and we'd love to do it. My,
-
my concern is that particularly with
the timing that would be needed with,
-
with Route 1 35 in the state, if,
-
if any recommendation goes forward to
have to do this as part of this project,
-
it's gonna kill this project
and we'd love to do this work.
-
I have no objection to it.
-
I think the timing alone and we
have means we have resources,
-
we have accessibility funds, particularly
for these kinds of efforts. So I'm,
-
I'm really thankful for
hearing what they are. Again,
-
I just don't think the
this project is the means,
-
the right means to get this kind of
stuff done. And I fear that. Yeah.
-
I think we're in agreement
there, Michelle. So I, yeah,
-
nobody's suggesting at this point that
these be made requirements for this
-
project. I, I,
-
my only suggestion was just that we
transmit this information to you in some
-
way so that you can be working on it,
-
on whatever timeline seems appropriate.
-
But I I don't think it should
hold up this project personally.
-
I don't think anybody on the
board is saying that. Right. Okay.
-
And somebody can, can
contradict me if they want.
-
Okay. Yes. Ready for the
motion. Thank you, Beth.
-
Move to approve the recommendation
to the planning board,
-
subject to any modifications
approved by the second
-
Colette. Aye Tom? Aye.
-
Beth Aye. And Mara Aye.
And I vote Aye as well.
-
Okay. Thank you very much. Thank
you. Thank you Justin. Thank you.
-
Thank you Michelle for
being here. Thank you. Aye,
-
okay, I've lost my agenda now.
-
Can somebody tell me what's
next? The union contracts.
-
Union contracts, thank you.
-
But my fan seems to have
reordered my papers here. Yes.
-
So we have both the library, oops, sorry,
-
just rolling here.
-
The Wealthy Free Library Staff
Association and the Wealthy Free Library.
-
I just wanna get the name
right. Supervisors Association.
-
We have,
-
they are identical in format except
for they are two distinct unions.
-
And this agreement would be
for a three year term under
-
this agreement,
-
we would be adding Juneteenth as
we've done with all of the unions.
-
We would be establishing a
new cost of living adjustment,
-
4% in f y 24,
-
3% in f y 25, 3% in f y 26.
-
In addition to that,
sorry, I'm just scrolling.
-
We would eliminate in
-
f y 25, I'm sorry,
-
in f y 26,
-
the 15 cent differential
for employees that
-
exist in a, a contract,
a portion of a contract.
-
We would also we're agreeing
to modify the definition of
-
grievance.
-
We're allowing for additional
executive meeting with council and for,
-
for the union members.
And in addition to that,
-
we would be creating a
new longevity schedule.
-
Prior years the library didn't
have longevity and until 15 years,
-
which was inconsistent with the
majority of our other unions,
-
which commenced the 10 years,
-
we would commence the 10 years and
establish a new pay schedule for
-
that, which would also be inclusive
of our part-time employees.
-
And so, sorry, I'm just scrolling up.
-
The f f y 24 settlement costs
for this would be inclusive
-
of five F M D employees
who are in this union.
-
But because they're custodians under
the jurisdiction of the facilities
-
director, total cost out is $97,458.
-
I also would just note that
the, the library associations,
-
it is very unique in terms
of the budgeting for the
library that any expense,
-
personal or expense has to also include
a component for materials costs.
-
And so this is also inclusive
of 13% increase of material
-
costs towards the library.
-
And so we'd be looking for the
board's approval to enter into the
-
memorandum memorandum of understanding
for this tentative agreement for both
-
unions.
-
I'll just mention for the benefit of
the public that this is also a subject
-
we've discussed exhaustively
on more than one occasion
-
in executive session.
-
So I'm not sure that there are
any questions or comments from,
-
from the board at this point. But if
there are, please raise your hand.
-
Okay. May we have the motion please, Beth?
-
Move to approve the memorandum
of understanding with the
Wellesley Free Library
-
Staff Association and the Wellesley
Free Library Supervisor Association
-
as
-
included in our Friday night
mail and outlined by Ms. Job.
-
Second. Beth Aye. Ann Mara.
-
Aye. Colette Aye. Tom? Aye. And aye.
-
Vote as well. Okay. I found my agenda.
-
Next item is to discuss the draft policy
-
on a subcommittee policy. So Megan,
-
I don't know if you wanna introduce that.
-
Sure. Hold on. Let me just
pull up my notes here.
-
But so Colette and I had been discussing,
-
Colette had actually done a, a, a
fairly substantial review of, hey,
-
here's the policies and we really should
be going back and evaluating some of
-
them. One, just because of
the duration of time and two,
-
as as we continue to
evaluate emerging trends in
-
for our financial policies.
And so as part of that,
-
we started reviewing how other towns
and departments handle the creation
-
of policies. And the school
committee CRE has created,
-
the Wealthy school committee has created
a policy subcommittee to then manage
-
that for both review of existing policies
as well as for the creation of new
-
We did a little bit of research and
also identified several select board
-
policies of the similar nature and
wanted to start the conversation with the
-
board as to whether the, the town
would wanna consider the creation.
-
So it's a policy for a subcommittee
policy for a subcommittee on
-
policies
-
so that we can start essentially
a systematic review of our,
-
of our policies and then have it
in place on a continual basis.
-
And, you know,
-
as we continue to explore different
initiatives and with the eye and lens of
-
d e i,
-
it's something that we really sh would
be encouraging many departments to look
-
at that you,
-
we really need to be looking at all
of our PO policies with a new lens.
-
And so there's many policies
we just, we haven't looked,
-
looked at in many years
or aren't following. And,
-
and so perhaps it's either you have to
revert to following it or we really,
-
our new systematic approach
is more appropriate.
-
So we just wanted to begin to broach
the subject with the board. Collette,
-
I don't know if you wanna
add anything to that.
-
That's, that's pretty much,
you know, where I came from,
-
we had been doing some policy
work and as we went through
-
some things recently, for example,
-
when we were looking at
our investment policy,
-
I read through the policy and noted it
had a note in there to be reviewed on a
-
regular basis. And I thought
that was important to pick up.
-
We recently a adjusted a
number of policies for public
comment and there's gonna
-
be some more revisions coming out on
that. And it made me sort of think about,
-
well, what are we doing
with our other policies?
-
And so I read through the policy
handbook in preparation for our
-
retreat and noticed that there
was a lot of policy work done in
-
maybe 2018, something like that. But,
-
you know, given covid and other items
that's maybe taken a little bit of a hold.
-
So this is a good time for
us to look at that again,
-
but find a more systematic
approach to it to be just more eff
-
efficient and effective and making sure
that we do it on a systematic basis and
-
have a a, a way to make it a bit
of an easier lift for the board.
-
So that was really the
genesis of this project.
-
Yeah, I I I support this idea.
-
I think being systematic about
it would be really helpful.
-
I know it has come up in conversation
over the past year, you know,
-
various policies that we
needed to look at, at again or,
-
you know, things we've talked where we
talked about creating a new policy. It,
-
it, it definitely is worth having.
-
I I think it's worth having a,
-
a slightly more streamlined
process so that there's a,
-
that we have a starting point, you know,
-
that's how I view the subcommittee as
creating some kind of starting point so
-
that then the board can move forward,
-
make whatever changes they
want, hold public hearings.
-
But, you know,
-
the a a little bit of a headstart
has been given to the board and,
-
and furthermore, the idea of tracking
all of the policies so that we know,
-
particularly the ones that
we use a lot, ought to get a,
-
a pretty systematic review so
that we know they aren't just,
-
we aren't, we're rethinking
them in the context of,
-
of current events and current conditions.
-
And it was helpful to talk with,
-
I talked with two members of the policy
subcommittee on our school committee to
-
see, you know, how how do you come to the
notion of what you're going to review.
-
And it's driven by a number of things.
-
And that's what I included in
the documents in our packet.
-
But it's either a policy we use a lot
or it's something that you see coming
-
because of your,
-
your industry body is telling you you
should really think about policies for
-
library materials, for example.
Or it's a policy that they,
-
they know that they might
not be complying with.
-
So they want to look at it and see does
it need to be changed or do we need to
-
change our policies to deal
with that? Or it's an interest,
-
a matter of interest to the community
and they feel that someone in the
-
community has brought it to
them for review and address.
-
So that to me was really helpful because
this is something they've had in place
-
for quite some time and you know, they,
they work on it on an ongoing basis.
-
So, one thing I just
wanna add, I I did put in
-
under the applicability that I,
-
I think there might be a policy that the
whole board wants to work on together,
-
you know, that it, and you know,
-
there might be a situation
where something comes up and,
-
and so I think it's important that we
have that as an exception that, you know,
-
the whole select board might say,
-
actually we all wanna
participate somehow. I,
-
I guess it would have to be in a public
meeting in the drafting of a policy or
-
at least the, the early discussions
of the drafting of a policy.
-
I can certainly imagine that happening. So
-
that was just one little
addition that I made. Tom.
-
I certainly support this idea and I
want to thank Megan and Colette and
-
particularly Colette for I understand
to be the very detailed look at the
-
policies that she undertook.
You know, I think that,
-
that we may need to prioritize the
order in which we look at these,
-
but I I think we have not done this
-
in so long that a really comprehensive
look at all our policies is
-
necessary.
-
Whether it's as simple as selectman
to select board or as complicated as
-
ensuring that we have an understanding
and incorporate court decisions recently
-
on the public's right to
comment to us and our,
-
the restrictions on our
ability to impose guidelines on
-
public speak.
-
These are all things that I think we
need to go back and think through.
-
There may be new policies
as you pointed out,
-
and some that can be streamlined by being
combined as someone pointed out as we
-
did with some of our alcohol policy.
-
So I think it's a great opportunity
coming out of covid with increased public
-
participation, going back to
in-person meetings, just in general,
-
I think an increase in the sort of
energy and town government that it's a,
-
a perfect time to be looking at
this and I certainly support this.
-
Any other thoughts? Ann Mara?
-
Yeah, so I,
-
I really appreciate the idea of going
back through all our policies and I think
-
that most of our boards do have some kind
of process for going through policies
-
on an annual basis. So I
appreciate this thought here.
-
I guess my, my question is,
-
I guess I'm a little bit
frustrated because, you know,
-
I've now been on this board for
two years and you know, we have,
-
there are a lot of really important
things that we need to be working on and
-
this is the first time I've ever heard
of creating a subcommittee and I think
-
there are other things that
are important that we should be
-
spending more time on.
-
And we have an entire retreat coming
up that we're gonna talk about policy.
-
So I would've loved to have taken this
time at this meeting to talk about
-
something more important to me and to the,
-
I think to the town and, and we don't
ever use that time in these meetings.
-
So I I I do think policies are important,
-
but there are means for getting work
done. They're not the work of the board,
-
they're just the means.
-
And I'm gonna quote Albert Einstein
who said bureaucracy is the death of
-
achievement. I would like
these meetings, our meetings,
-
our public meetings to have more
meat to them and talk about things
-
that are more important. I mean,
-
right now 50% of people in Massachusetts
ha pay more than 30% of their
-
income in rent. I mean,
-
we have a real housing problem and
we have a community that doesn't
-
understand that because we
don't talk about it as a board.
-
We talk about it individually, we talk
about it in the housing task force,
-
but we don't really share
with the community the
challenges that our residents
-
and the rest of Massachusetts are facing.
-
And I think we need to talk
about this on a regular basis.
-
We need to bring it to people's attention.
-
So I I appreciate doing this in
a subcommittee. Yeah, go for it.
-
I don't wanna be on it,
-
but I do wanna approve policies
once the subcommittee works on them.
-
I just would rather,
-
we were talking about this at the retreat
that we set up to talk about policies
-
and we're using this time for something
different. That's my only thought.
-
Okay. Any further comments?
-
All right. Could I just clarify,
-
we're talking about a policy that
-
all policies are reviewed by a designated
-
set of select board
members in a subcommittee,
-
which is a public session,
right? Yeah. This is a public,
-
a public body that meets
and takes minutes Yeah.
-
And does it in a more
systematic way than what,
-
and I, I really appreciate Colette
going through and doing the,
-
the thorough inventory of our policies.
-
I thought, and I, so I guess
it's, the question is, I think,
-
do we wanna change our procedure,
which our normal procedure,
-
as long as I've been on the board,
-
is that when an issue arises
where either the policy needs to
-
be looked at or we need a new policy,
-
someone works on it and designated
-
to a standing committee. So this
would be our only standing committee,
-
our standing subgroup, is that right?
And they would get all the policies.
-
Yeah. So the idea is that any policy
that was being reviewed, well I,
-
I think there are two major
functions of the subcommittee.
-
One is when it comes up that we
need a new one, a new policy,
-
the subcommittee would draft it and
the other function would be to track
-
the current policies just
to make sure they're,
-
they're getting a fresh look periodically,
-
they're not just sort
of sitting on a shelf.
-
And you know,
-
in particular the policies that
govern some of our core functions like
-
our, our financial policies,
-
those would obviously be I, and I mean,
-
I will just say that in the course
of the time I've been on the board,
-
we've enacted several,
-
a number of new policies
always with the sort of caveat
-
that we'll revisit this policy down the
road and sort of see how it's going.
-
And, and we actually don't have
a mechanism for doing that. So I,
-
I think it's, it's just a very helpful
-
Mechanism really to, to make sure that,
-
that we are doing that and that we're
visiting things that revisiting things
-
that we thought were made sense to
make sure that once they're in place,
-
they actually do. So that's,
-
that's the idea. But it, it's two
members of the board is what we're,
-
what the policy is proposing.
-
Okay. Well we can certainly, we, you know,
-
generally the board likes to have a
couple of discussions of things before we
-
vote. So we can certainly pick
it back up at the retreat.
-
And if no one has anything else to say,
-
I will adjourn the meeting. Do
we have a town hall update? Yeah,
-
we have one more update. Oh, I
beg your pardon. That's right. I,
-
I'm looking at the, I'm not looking at
the adjusted agenda, so sorry about that.
-
So I think, and, and Megan, you
know, may have some comments too.
-
We had an opportunity, well
first of all, let me go back. I,
-
I think everyone's aware
that with regard to a,
-
a tour of town hall for safety reasons,
-
the contractor has made it
clear that that has to wait.
-
The central staircase is
being demolished and it really
-
is not an environment which anyone
can go in except for the contractors.
-
They will let us know when,
-
when that's no longer the issue
and we can arrange for a tour.
-
The principles of Schwartz Silver
responsible for the job had a chance
-
to go through the
building with our owners,
-
project manager Glenn Remick,
-
to discuss a number of
the deficiencies in the,
-
in the building and to
reconsider or to consider
-
a new, some of the solutions that
we had considered originally.
-
And they have gone through
with a preliminary report on
-
recommendations that they would make with
regard to things like the woodwork and
-
the finish on the, on the wood, on some
of the irregularities of the brick,
-
if not the changes in
color and discoloration,
-
different brick that was used
to close up arch doorways for
-
example. And we're
working through, not we,
-
but they are P V C and F M
D are working through with
-
Schwartz silver, what will be a,
-
a report that P B C will
consider use of basis to look at
-
further changes that need to be made in
the project and how we're solving some
-
of these problems.
-
One interesting thing that came up was
the case and the weights and measures
-
and we all remember sort of
what we went through discovering
-
exactly what that was and
it's it's purpose as an item
-
in, in Wellesley,
-
one of the discussions we had
was where to relocate that,
-
where locate that in the, in the building.
-
It's not as simple as just putting it
back where it was not only because it
-
really isn't consistent with
the feel of that, of that lobby,
-
but it would require
-
not insignificant additional
work to shore up that location
-
because of the weight of that cabinet.
-
So one consideration is,
-
is two different items.
-
One is to see whether we
can perhaps from C P C seek
-
funds to refinish that
cabinet and to bring it back
-
in terms of what it looks,
what its exterior looks like.
-
And the other is to look for
a location on the lower level
-
in a location where there would be some
ability to highlight that cabinet as
-
something that you saw when
you went in on that level to
-
visit one of those departments.
-
So that would not present the
problem of having to shore up
-
the support because it would be on
a level that could handle the weight
-
of that, of that case.
So I know that we had,
-
the board was engaged in how we
handled a lot of items that were
-
in town hall.
-
This is certainly an important
one in terms of the town and
-
I just wanted to raise for the,
-
for the board an awareness of
what we were looking at with that
-
particular item in particular
and the potential for it to
-
be improved in terms of its external
appearance and to be located safely
-
in a highlighted area on the lower level.
-
So Tom, you'll bring that
back to us to discuss later?
-
Yes. Yeah, we, we will, once there is a,
-
we, we shouldn't be too long,
-
but once there's an awareness of sort
of what the best area would be on the
-
lower level because some work will have
to be done in order to create the space
-
for it, we'll bring that back
-
with regard to the
-
improvements or changes
in the scope of the actual
-
work on the interior. You know,
-
a budget will have to be developed
and of course this is a P V C project,
-
so that'll be a discussion
that P V C will be having about
-
the scope of any or changes
in the scope of the work,
-
what the implications are,
-
how that weighs against the
contingencies that we have in place
-
and whether these are advisable
and whether they would
ultimately be approved by
-
P B C.
-
Can I just ask you in
case anyone inquires,
-
why is the floor not able to handle
something it's been handling for so
-
long?
-
It, it hasn't, correct
me if I'm wrong Megan,
-
but there was evidence that
there was a significant support
-
underneath that cabinet
where it sat in the lobby.
-
So the issue where it sat, so there
was a support and there was a,
-
a different platform that the weight
was distributed on underneath that when
-
they removed it, there's holes on the,
-
a hole on the floor that has to be
removed and it's part of where it was
-
previously located
-
as part of the new H V A C system.
-
And so if we were gonna put
it back at that location, it,
-
which is not opportune based upon
the design we would have to remove
-
and I forget what type of
equipment it is that, that.
-
That's enough of an answer cuz we're
changing something else. Structure.
-
Yeah. Yes. Yeah. Because when we removed
that platform, as you might recall,
-
you know, that didn't match the tile
floor. And so when we removed that,
-
that those are some of the things
that we found and that was being
-
converted anyway because
of the H B C. But,
-
so there continues to be a hole there
that we're, we're actually working on.
-
But Megan and I were sensitive to the
discussion that took place when this all
-
of these items in town hall came
up and we wanted to be sure that we
-
brought this one right back to the
board and that you were all aware of the
-
discussions and,
-
and possible relocation and
outcome for this particular item.
-
And that in,
-
in considering this we're I think trying
to demonstrate that we value the item.
-
We're just trying to figure out a
way to put it back in town hall in
-
good shape in a place that doesn't
require a significant additional expense
-
in terms of support.
-
and I guess the other thought is too is
it sort of came to me in a discussion
-
of, well if we did wanna
refurbish it, it's historic,
-
we could maybe seek
some funds from cpc it,
-
would the board be amenable to me at
least starting that conversation with,
-
with cpc? I.
-
I I certainly would Megan.
-
Cause I get the sense from
listening to their discussions,
-
especially around the historic
-
opportunities they have that they would
like to have more opportunities to fund
-
items in that area. So if it's a good fit,
-
I would certainly be interested in at
least asking them if they would like to
-
join with us on that.
-
I I.
-
Hope if we do, I, sorry,
-
I would be remiss if I didn't say
that we have not talked to them yet,
-
so I don't want anyone from C P C
listening and thinking that there's any
-
assumption that they will fund it
or presumption that they should.
-
That's why Megan's saying, can we at
least have a preliminary conversation?
-
I, I would just suggest if we're gonna
do that, that the funds also include
-
some, you know,
-
a little bit of research and a plaque
that describes what the thing is because I
-
know it, it wa you know,
-
wa wasn't until we talked about it that
I had any idea what those things were or
-
the historical significance of
them or anything else. So I,
-
if we're going to go to the
trouble of refurbishing it,
-
maybe C P C would give just enough
money to provide a little research and
-
composition of something that
could educate the public.
-
And the building of the,
the, I forget his title, Mr.
-
Waitson measures gave us a very nice
writeup at the time that we could probably
-
build off of.
-
He, he did actually, that
was very quick, very.
-
Helpful. I mean he,
-
he had done a little historical
overview that was pretty excellent.
-
So Megan as the CPC liaison,
I can work with you on that.
-
Terrific. And I think Abby had
actually, I will look at my recollection
-
was that she had preliminary started
like mapping out some, some of that.
-
So I'll do
-
to find out someone to get a cost
estimate, so that'd be great. Anmar.
-
Thank you.
-
Okay. Am I forgetting anything else?
-
No. Okay. And so now we are adjourned.