City of Kalamazoo - May 7, 2026 Natural Features Protection & Review Board

Updated about 10 hours ago

Key discussions at May 7, 2026 Natural Features Protection Review Board Meeting centered around the Westgate Sports Complex Phase Two project. The board examined the removal of nine dead trees, the implications for bat habitats, and the proposed landscaping plans. There was particular attention given to the selection of tree species and the replacement of bat habitat. The board also considered the impact of salt on newly planted trees and the integration of native plant species. The motion to approve the site plan with specific conditions, including maintaining tree protection fencing and submitting necessary permits, was passed. The meeting also touched on the broader goals of aligning the NFP's work with climate action plans and sustainable design practices.

Chapters

Call to Order (00:00:04)
The regular meeting of the NFP Review Board was called to order.

The meeting commenced with the call to order of the regular session of the National Features Protection (NFP) Review Board.
Roll Call (00:00:09)
Roll call was conducted. Nolan called the roll and noted absences.

Nolan called the roll for the meeting. Members present were noted, and it was observed that Roe and Murgia were absent.
Adoption of Agenda (00:00:45)
The agenda was presented for approval and adopted with a motion.

The agenda for the meeting was presented, and a motion was requested and made to adopt the agenda as presented.
Approval of Minutes (00:01:02)
Minutes from the previous meeting were reviewed and approved with minor amendments.

The minutes from the previous National Features Protection Review meeting were reviewed. A minor amendment was noted regarding a misspelling in the communications and announcements section. The minutes were approved with the amendment.
Public Comments (00:03:08)
Public comments were invited, but none were made in person or via call-in.

The chair opened the floor for public comments, inviting attendees to address the board. No comments were received either in person or through call-in methods.
New Business: Westgate Sports Complex Phase Two (00:04:23)
Discussion on Westgate Sports Complex Phase Two. A board member recused themselves.

The board moved to discuss the new business item, Westgate Sports Complex Phase Two. One board member recused themselves from the discussion.
New Business: Drake Road Development Phase Two (00:05:23)
Nolan provided background on Drake Road Phase Two, with a focus on variances and woodland preservation.

Nolan presented the background for Drake Road Development Phase Two. The discussion included past meetings about variances, particularly regarding slope setback standards and woodland preservation.
Applicant Presentation and Discussion (00:10:09)
The applicant team presented additional context and answered board questions.

The applicant team for the Drake Road Development provided additional information and context about the project. They fielded questions from the board members regarding various aspects of the project.
Discussion on Plant Species and Habitat (00:14:00)
Board members discussed plant species selections and potential habitats for endangered species.

Board members engaged in a detailed discussion about the selection of plant species within the project site and their potential impact on local habitat, especially concerning endangered species such as bats.
Vote on New Business Item: Westgate Sports Complex Phase Two (00:26:34)
The board voted to approve Phase Two of the Westgate Sports Complex project with conditions.

After discussion, a motion was made to approve Phase Two of the Westgate Sports Complex project with specific conditions related to site plan approval, permits, and tree protection fencing. The motion was seconded and passed.
NFP Board Work Session (00:35:33)
Discussion about NFP guide updates and potential future goals related to sustainable design and climate action.

During the work session, the board discussed updates to the NFP guide, incorporating sustainable design practices, and aligning with climate action goals. The discussion included how the board can evolve to address future challenges while maintaining regulatory predictability for developers.