Comstock Charter Township - February 19, 2026 Comstock Township Planning Commission

Updated about 3 hours ago

The commission reviewed and approved a site plan for a lot expansion proposed by Bosma. A discussion on a potential rezoning request by Mark Zani was noted, pending further action by the Township Board regarding a fee waiver. Citizen comments raised concerns about the impact of new developments, including potential data centers and their effects on the community. The commission also resolved to pursue a one-year moratorium on data centers to better prepare for potential applications. Additionally, the commission considered updates to landscaping ordinances and the master plan, setting a schedule for future discussions. This meeting highlights the proactive steps taken by the planning commission to manage development and zoning within the township.

Chapters

Call to Order (00:01:30)
The meeting of the Charter Township of Comstock planning commission is called to order.

The chairperson calls the meeting to order at six o'clock, marking the official start of the proceedings.
Pledge of Allegiance (00:01:36)
The Pledge of Allegiance is recited by all attendees, showing respect for the nation.

Attendees are invited to join in the Pledge of Allegiance as a formal start to the meeting, reflecting on the values of the United States.
Approval of Agenda (00:02:00)
The agenda for the meeting is reviewed and approved by the commissioners.

The chairperson seeks approval for the agenda, asking if there are any changes or additions. A motion to approve is made and seconded, followed by a unanimous vote in favor.
Approval of Minutes (00:02:57)
The minutes from previous meetings are reviewed and approved with minor corrections.

Commissioners discuss and approve the minutes from previous meetings, noting minor corrections regarding titles and roles. A motion is made to approve the revised minutes, and it passes unanimously.
Citizen Comments (00:06:12)
Citizens present their concerns, particularly about local development projects.

Citizens are invited to speak for up to three minutes each. Comments include concerns about local projects like battery storage and an AI facility, with citizens worried about environmental impacts and the transparency of the process.
Site Plan Review (00:13:46)
A site plan review for a lot expansion is presented and discussed.

Casey presents a site plan review for a lot expansion at a light manufacturing site. The plan meets zoning standards, and commissioners discuss the proposal, appreciating the thoroughness of the submission. A vote is taken to approve the site plan based on factual findings, and it passes unanimously.
Annual Report (00:19:26)
The annual report of the planning commission's activities is reviewed.

Casey presents the annual report, summarizing the planning commission's activities over the past year. Highlights include numerous rezonings and training sessions. Commissioners discuss the report and express appreciation for its thoroughness, suggesting more frequent updates.
Administrative Procedures Discussion (00:27:00)
Discussion on improving transparency and tracking of administrative procedures.

Commissioners discuss how to improve transparency in administrative procedures, suggesting a tracking system for site plans and special use applications. They express a desire to be more informed about ongoing projects and administrative reviews, with Casey agreeing to develop a system for future updates.
Approval of Annual Report (00:33:37)
The board discussed and approved the annual report with a motion made by Commissioner Nichols, supported by Commissioner Kritzer, and passed unanimously.

The meeting discussed the approval of the annual report. There was a brief discussion on the necessity of approval, followed by a motion made by Commissioner Nichols to approve the report, which was seconded by Commissioner Kritzer. The motion passed unanimously with all in favor.
Old Business: Planned Unit Development (00:36:02)
The board reviewed sample ordinances for planned unit developments, favoring the South Haven example for its flexibility and control.

The discussion centered around reviewing planned unit development (PUD) ordinances, with a focus on flexibility, control, and compatibility with local goals. The South Haven ordinance was preferred for its balance of flexibility and control, allowing for more creative developments while maintaining oversight. The possibility of incorporating incentives for developers and ensuring developments meet community needs was emphasized.
Old Business: Landscaping Ordinances (00:55:24)
The board discussed potential updates to the landscaping ordinance to address developer concerns over costs and tree requirements.

The discussion focused on the current landscaping ordinance, with concerns about the cost burden it places on developers, particularly regarding tree requirements. Suggestions included reducing the width of landscaping areas in parking lots, incorporating provisions for utility line clearance, and allowing for discretionary waivers in certain circumstances. The aim is to balance aesthetic and environmental goals with practical considerations for developers.
Discussion on Public Safety and Tree Canopies (01:04:34)
Discussion on public safety issues related to tree canopies interfering with power lines and buildings.

The meeting discussed public safety concerns about tree canopies that interfere with power lines and structures. Suggestions were made to maintain vegetation below power lines and consider underground utilities. A consensus was reached on adding guidelines for tree planting near utility lines.
Parking Lot Island and Vegetation Guidelines (01:06:19)
Evaluation of parking lot island vegetation guidelines, including island width and vegetation type.

The board discussed the minimum width for parking lot islands, the type of vegetation suitable for such islands, and how these regulations affect parking space availability. A five-foot minimum width for islands was debated, considering flexibility in parking layouts and the need for visibility.
Exceptions and Safety Considerations in Planning (01:12:13)
Considerations for exceptions to planning guidelines based on safety and utility concerns.

Members discussed the need for flexibility in planning guidelines, particularly regarding exceptions for safety and utility purposes. The board agreed to review cases individually and consider adding safety notations for exceptions, ensuring they have discretion in planning decisions.
Data Center Development and Moratorium (01:13:59)
Discussion on data center developments and the need for a moratorium to prepare guidelines.

The board discussed potential data center developments and the importance of being prepared to handle such applications. They considered implementing a one-year moratorium to study and develop guidelines that protect the community from unwanted developments and ensure compliance with zoning laws.
Motion for Moratorium on Data Centers (01:24:11)
A motion was made and passed to proceed with a one-year moratorium on data centers.

A motion was proposed and passed to initiate a one-year moratorium on data center developments, allowing the board to conduct further studies and consultations. The motion received unanimous approval from the commissioners.
Master Plan Discussion (01:26:07)
Initial discussion on reviewing and updating the master plan, considering a detailed evaluation process.

The board began discussing the need to review and possibly update the master plan. They considered the process of evaluating the current plan, identifying areas for change, and potentially involving external planners. The discussion highlighted the importance of a thorough review and setting a timeline for future meetings.
Discussion on CIP Funding for Master Plan (01:35:02)
Discussion regarding funding in the CIP for the Master Plan for next year, with inquiries about the exact amount allotted.

There was a discussion about the funds available in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the Master Plan, which is hoped to be scheduled for next year as it is required. The exact amount and allocation of these funds were inquired about. Various members shared their thoughts, but no further action was taken at this time. The discussion concluded with a plan to add this topic to a later agenda for further review.
Rezoning Request by Mr. Zani (01:36:08)
Mr. Zani requested rezoning of his split-zoned lots and a fee waiver, believing a township error occurred.

Mr. Zani has requested a rezoning of his two lots, which he claims were incorrectly zoned by the township. The lots are currently split-zoned, half commercial and half residential. Mr. Zani provided evidence supporting his claim that the lots were previously zoned as commercial. He is seeking a fee waiver for the rezoning request, asserting it was a township error. The township board will address this request in an upcoming meeting, and the outcome will determine the next steps. The planning commission discussed the validity of the zoning lines, acknowledging the potential error.
Public Comments Section (01:42:18)
Residents expressed concerns about tornado sirens, data centers, building compliance, and zoning issues.

During the public comments section, several residents voiced their concerns. One resident thanked the board for a moratorium and raised issues about tornado sirens and a data center, emphasizing the need to consider taxpayer interests. Another resident discussed challenges with the business service establishment policy and delays in zoning text amendments affecting grant writing. They emphasized the need for better cooperation and alignment with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA). The board listened to these concerns and acknowledged the need for further consideration.
Updates from Other Boards (01:51:00)
CBA report and future planning commission agenda items discussed, with updates on site condominium project.

The meeting proceeded to updates from other boards. The Chair reported that the CBA had not met recently, and Treasurer Bloomfield had no updates. Upcoming agenda items for the planning commission were discussed, including a site condominium project on Lee Ave, which will require further review and discussion at both the township board and planning commission levels. The process involves multiple steps and approvals, with check-ins as the project progresses.
Planning Commissioner Comments (01:54:18)
Commissioners reflected on the meeting's productivity and proactive discussions on upcoming issues.

During the planning commissioner comments, members reflected on the productive nature of the meeting and expressed satisfaction with the proactive approach being taken towards upcoming issues. They appreciated the discussions and felt that the commission was heading in the right direction, preparing effectively for future challenges. The meeting was then adjourned.